Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 28 Jan 2007):

Comparison between lecture-based approach and case/problem-based learning discussion for teaching pre-anaesthetic assessment.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND

AND OBJECTIVE:
The case/problem-based learning discussion method was recently introduced into the theory-based training program for residents run by the Catalan Society of Anaesthesiology. This study was designed to assess and compare its effectiveness with that of the lecture-based approach for teaching pre-anaesthetic assessment, applying an objective tool for knowledge evaluation before and after teaching.

METHODS:
A prospective randomized study of two consecutive year groups of first year anaesthesiology residents was conducted. Twenty-nine residents attended a lecture, and 25, a case/problem-based learning discussion session. Their knowledge of pre-anaesthetic assessment was assessed before and after the teaching session with tests on four different clinical cases measuring six fields:
(1) 'recognizing clinical data with anaesthetic implications'; (2) 'reasoning clinical data with anaesthetic implications'; (3) 'ASA class'; (4) 'Mallampati class'; (5) 'choice of anaesthetic technique'; (6) 'reasoning choice of anaesthetic technique'.

RESULTS:
Before the teaching session, the lecture group scored significantly higher on field 1 (P = 0.006). Both teaching methods improved scores on fields 1, 2 and 4. The case/problem group also improved on fields 3 and 6. After the teaching session, the field 1 score was still significantly higher in the lecture group (P = 0.005), and the field 3 score was significantly higher in the case/problem group (P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS:
The effectiveness of lecture and case/problem-based learning discussion differed little in terms of improving participants' immediate knowledge of 'pre-anaesthetic assessment'.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Carrero, E (E); Gomar, C (C); Penzo, W (W); Rull, M (M);

Affiliation: University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic, Department of Anaesthesiology, Barcelona, Spain. ecarrero(-atsign-)clinic.ub.es

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal: European journal of anaesthesiology (Eur J Anaesthesiol), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Dec; vol 24 (issue 12) : pp 1008-15

Dates: Created 2007/11/06; Completed 2008/02/14; Revised 2008/08/14;

PMID: 17261212, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentIn: Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Aug;25(8):689. (PMID: 18339211)

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

11/29/2000
2/27/2006
Higher Relevance Score (13)
Lower Relevance Score (9)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2009 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index