Preceptorship rurality does not affect medical students' shelf exam scores.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE:
This study's objective was to determine whether junior medical students' end-of-rotation shelf exam scores varied by the preceptorship county's rurality.

METHODS:
Student learning during rural preceptorship experiences, 1999 to 2005, was assessed using the students' scores on the National Board of Medical Examiners family medicine subject examination. Rurality was measured using both population density and the rural-urban continuum (RUC) codes.

RESULTS:
Exam scores were collected between January 1999 and May 2005 for 734 students. Mean scores did not vary significantly by rurality, although they did vary significantly by semester. Test scores of students in rural locations were not statistically significantly different from those of students in urban preceptorships.

CONCLUSIONS:
Students assigned to preceptorships in rural locations scored at the same levels as students in urban preceptorships. The finding that there were no differences in medical students' exam scores based on the rurality of their family medicine preceptorship site indicates a substantial degree of educational equivalency between urban and rural preceptorships.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Lacy, Naomi L (NL); Geske, Jenenne A (JA); Goodman, Barbara J (BJ); Hartman, Teresa L (TL); Paulman, Paul M (PM);

Affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, University of Nebraska, NE 68198-3075, USA. nlacy(-atsign-)unmc.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Family medicine (Fam Med), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Feb; vol 39 (issue 2) : pp 112-5

Dates: Created 2007/02/02; Completed 2007/04/16; Revised 2007/09/20;

PMID: 17273953, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentIn: Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;39(7):462. (PMID: 17602315)

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.