Dissociation between striatal regions while learning to categorize via feedback and via observation.

Full Abstract

Convergent evidence from functional imaging and from neuropsychological studies of basal ganglia disorders indicates that the striatum is involved in learning to categorize visual stimuli with feedback. However, it is unclear which cognitive process or processes involved in categorization is or are responsible for striatal recruitment; different regions of the striatum have been linked to feedback processing and to acquisition of stimulus-category associations. We examined the effect of the presence of feedback during learning on striatal recruitment by comparing feedback learning with observational learning of an information integration task. In the feedback task, participants were shown a stimulus, made a button press response, and then received feedback as to whether they had made the correct response. In the observational task, participants were given the category label before the stimulus appeared and then made a button press indicating the correct category membership. A region-of-interest analysis was used to examine activity in three regions of the striatum:
the head of the caudate, body and tail of the caudate, and the putamen. Activity in the left head of the caudate was modulated by the presence of feedback:
The magnitude of activation change was greater during feedback learning than during observational learning. In contrast, the bilateral body and tail of the caudate and the putamen were active to a similar degree in both feedback and observational learning. This pattern of results supports a functional dissociation between regions of the striatum, such that the head of the caudate is involved in feedback processing, whereas the body and tail of the caudate and the putamen are involved in learning stimulus-category associations. The hippocampus was active bilaterally during both feedback and observational learning, indicating potential parallel involvement with the striatum in information integration category learning.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Cincotta, Corinna M (CM); Seger, Carol A (CA);

Affiliation: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Journal of cognitive neuroscience (J Cogn Neurosci), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Feb; vol 19 (issue 2) : pp 249-65

Dates: Created 2007/02/06; Completed 2007/04/24;

PMID: 17280514, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Adult
Brain Mapping
Corpus Striatum - blood supply; physiology
Discrimination Learning - physiology
Feedback, Psychological - physiology
Female
Humans

Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Observation
Oxygen - blood
Photic Stimulation - methods

Associated Chemicals: Oxygen (7782-44-7)

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.