The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials.

Full Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of death qualification, belief in a just world (BJW), legal authoritarianism (RLAQ), and locus of control (LOC) on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. 212 venirepersons from the 12th Judicial Circuit in Bradenton, FL, completed a booklet that contained the following:
one question that measured their attitudes toward the death penalty; one question that categorized their death-qualification status; the BJW, LOC, and RLAQ scales; a summary of the guilt and penalty phases of a capital case; a 26-item measure that required participants to evaluate aggravators, nonstatutory mitigators, and statutory mitigators on a 6-point Likert scale; sentence preference; and standard demographic questions. Results indicated that death-qualified venirepersons were more likely to demonstrate higher endorsements of aggravating factors and lower endorsements of both nonstatutory and statutory mitigating factors. Death-qualified participants were also more likely to have a high belief in a just world, espouse legal authoritarian beliefs, and exhibit an internal locus of control. Findings also suggested that venirepersons with a low belief in a just world and an external locus of control demonstrated higher endorsements of statutory mitigators. Participants with legal authoritarian beliefs revealed higher endorsements of aggravators and lower endorsements of nonstatutory mitigators. Legal implications and applications are discussed.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Butler, Brooke (B); Moran, Gary (G);

Affiliation: University of South Florida, Sarasota Department of Psychology, 8350 North Tamiami Trail Sarasota, FL 34243, USA. bbutler(-atsign-)banshee.sar.usf.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Behavioral sciences & the law (Behav Sci Law), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-; vol 25 (issue 1) : pp 57-68

Dates: Created 2007/02/13; Completed 2007/05/01;

PMID: 17285584, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

A healer or an executioner? The proper role of a psychiatrist in a criminal justice system. 30 Dec 2001
Medical theories on the cause of death in crucifixion. 30 Mar 2006
Societal threat, authoritarianism, conservatism, and U.S. state death penalty sentencing (1977-2004). 29 Apr 2008
Death qualification and prejudice: the effect of implicit racism, sexism, and homophobia on capital defendants' right to due process. 30 Dec 2006
Post-traumatic stress disorder in children witnessing a public hanging in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 30 Dec 2005
Florida's lethal-injection process involves pharmacist. 13 Sep 2001
Review of autopsy findings in judicial electrocutions. 30 Aug 2005
The Women's International League for Peace and Freedom. 1953. 30 Dec 2003
The death penalty. 29 Nov 2003
The lethal injection quandary: how medicine has dismantled the death penalty. 29 Sep 2007

See 100+ related articles.