|
|
| Research article summary (published 19 Feb 2007): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
Undergoing prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: presentation of choice and information in Europe and Asia.
Full Abstract
To date, studies assessing whether the information given to people about screening tests facilitates informed choices have focussed mainly on the UK, US and Australia. The extent to which written information given in other countries facilitates informed choices is not known. The aim of this study is to describe the presentation of choice and information about Down's syndrome in written information about prenatal screening given to pregnant women in five European and two Asian countries. Leaflets were obtained from clinicians in UK, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Czech Republic, China and India. Two analyses were conducted. First, all relevant text relating to the choice about undergoing screening was extracted and described. Second, each separate piece of information or statement about the condition being screened for was extracted and then coded as either positive, negative or neutral. Only Down's syndrome was included in the analysis since there was relatively little information about other conditions. There was a strong emphasis on choice and the need for discussion about prenatal screening tests in the leaflets from the UK and Netherlands. The leaflet from the UK gave most information about Down's syndrome and the smallest proportion of negative information. By contrast, the Chinese leaflet did not mention choice and gave the most negative information about Down's syndrome. Leaflets from the other countries were more variable. This variation may reflect cultural differences in attitudes to informed choice or a failure to facilitate informed choice in practice. More detailed studies are needed to explore this further.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Hall, Sue (S); Chitty, Lyn (L); Dormandy, Elizabeth (E); Hollywood, Amelia (A); Wildschut, Hajo I J (HI); Fortuny, Albert (A); Masturzo, Bianca (B); Santavý, Jiří (J); Kabra, Madhulika (M); Ma, Runmei (R); Marteau, Theresa M (TM);
Affiliation: King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychology at Guy's, Health Psychology Section, London, UK.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: European journal of human genetics : EJHG (Eur J Hum Genet), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2007-May; vol 15 (issue 5) : pp 563-9
Dates: Created 2007/04/26; Completed 2007/06/19;
PMID: 17311082, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Ethical decision making in first trimester pregnancy screening.
30 Mar 2005 - [Information disclosure when screening for trisomy 21: a decision-making aid for pregnant women?]
30 Jan 2001 - [Nuchal translucency measurement in early diagnosis of Down syndrome]
10 Dec 2001 - Antenatal care--antenatal screening for fetal abnormality.
30 Jan 2003 - A comparison of the impact of screen-positive results obtained from ultrasound and biochemical screening for Down syndrome in the first trimester: a pilot study.
29 Apr 2004 - Coping with serum screening for Down syndrome when the results is given as a numeric value.
30 Jul 1998 - Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff?
29 Nov 2002 - Women's preferences for reporting of Down syndrome screening results.
30 Oct 2002 - Maternal serum screening for Down syndrome--opinions on acceptance from Swedish women.
27 Feb 2003 - Do women prefer to have screening tests for Down syndrome that have the lowest screen-positive rate or the highest detection rate?
29 Sep 2003
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.