Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2007):

On dichotomizing phenotypes in family-based association tests: quantitative phenotypes are not always the optimal choice.

Full Abstract

In family-based association studies, quantitative traits are thought to provide higher statistical power than dichotomous traits. Consequently, it is standard practice to collect quantitative traits and to analyze them as such. However, in many situations, continuous measurements are more difficult to obtain and/or need to be adjusted for other factors/confounding variables which also have to be measured. In such scenarios, it can be advantageous to record and analyze a "simplified/dichotomized" version of the original trait. Under fairly general circumstances, we derive here rules for the dichotomization of quantitative traits that maintain power levels that are comparable to the analysis of the original quantitative trait. Using simulation studies, we show that the proposed rules are robust against phenotypic misclassification, making them an ideal tool for inexpensive phenotyping in large-scale studies. The guidelines are illustrated by an application to an asthma study.Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Fardo, David (D); Celedón, Juan C (JC); Raby, Benjamin A (BA); Weiss, Scott T (ST); Lange, Christoph (C);

Affiliation: Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. dfardo(-atsign-)hsph.farvard.edu

Grants: 5 R01 MH059532 (Agency:NIMH NIH HHS) ; 5 T32 HL07427-26 (Agency:NHLBI NIH HHS) ; N01-HR-16049 (Agency:NHLBI NIH HHS) ; T90 DK070078 (Agency:NIDDK NIH HHS)

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Journal: Genetic epidemiology (Genet Epidemiol), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Jul; vol 31 (issue 5) : pp 376-82

Dates: Created 2007/06/28; Completed 2007/08/06; Revised 2007/12/03;

PMID: 17342772, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

6/15/2008
9/29/2008
Higher Relevance Score (9)
Lower Relevance Score (7)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2009 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index