A new procedure for communication with a patient with minimal motor function and fatigability.

Full Abstract

As with eye movements in locked-in syndrome, severe motor dysfunction should be coped with by an agreed system of interpretation to express feelings and needs. However, it is possible that such patients might make errors in the agreed system of interpretation through fatigue, which would cause misunderstandings. We report here a new questioning and verifying strategy for an agreed system of interpretation. Our questioning strategy is characterized by repeating questions in different forms, specifically by affirmative and negative sentences (Double-Checked agreed system of interpretation). When the patient wants to express "Yes", a single movement is required for an affirmative question and no movement is required for a negative one. When the patient wants to express "No", no movement is required for an affirmative question and one movement is required for a negative one. The Double-Checked agreed system of interpretation can help patients to cope with fatigability and can also help to prevent misunderstandings. If the same responses to both affirmative and negative questions are given, we can consider that those answers reflect fatigue. In addition, we have developed a strategy to evaluate the patient's understanding of the Double-Checked agreed system of interpretation by modifying the Western Aphasia Battery. This report describes how to apply the Double-Checked agreed system of interpretation, using the example of a 48-year-old brain-injured man with minimal motor function and severe fatigability.

Author information

Author/s: Uruma, Go (G); Hashimoto, Keiji (K); Onouchi, Kenji (K); Nishio, Yoshiyuki (Y); Kurita, Akira (A); Inoue, Kiyoharu (K);

Affiliation: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Case Reports; Journal Article

Journal: Journal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (J Rehabil Med), published in Sweden. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Mar; vol 39 (issue 2) : pp 185-8

Dates: Created 2007/03/12; Completed 2007/04/02;

PMID: 17351704, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.