Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 13 Mar 2007):

Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise?

Full Abstract

RATIONALE:
In heavy drinkers, training attention towards alcohol cues increases alcohol craving, but it is not clear if effects of 'attentional training' generalise to novel stimuli and measurement procedures.

OBJECTIVES:
We investigated possible generalisation of attentional training to novel alcohol cues and other methods of measuring cognitive bias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:
A modified visual probe task was used to train participants to direct their attention either towards ('attend alcohol' group) or away from ('avoid alcohol' group) alcohol cues; attentional bias was not manipulated in a control group (total N = 60). After attentional training, we measured cognitive bias (using visual probe, modified Stroop, flicker-induced change blindness and stimulus-response compatibility tasks), alcohol craving and alcohol consumption.

RESULTS:
Attentional bias for alcohol cues increased in the 'attend alcohol' group, and this effect generalised to novel stimuli, but not to other cognitive bias tasks. In the 'avoid alcohol' group, attentional bias was reduced for the stimuli that were used during attentional training, but these effects did not generalise to different stimuli or cognitive bias tasks. Alcohol craving increased among participants in the 'attend alcohol' group, but only among participants who were aware of the experimental contingencies during attentional training. There were no group differences in alcohol consumption.

CONCLUSIONS:
The effects of attentional training show limited generalisation to different alcohol cues and methods of measuring cognitive bias. Experimentally increased attentional bias seems to increase subjective craving, but only among participants who are aware of the experimental contingencies that were in place during attentional training.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Field, Matt (M); Duka, Theodora (T); Eastwood, Brian (B); Child, Robert (R); Santarcangelo, Mary (M); Gayton, Melanie (M);

Affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. mfield(-atsign-)liverpool.ac.uk

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Psychopharmacology (Psychopharmacology (Berl)), published in Germany. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Jul; vol 192 (issue 4) : pp 593-608

Dates: Created 2007/06/01; Completed 2007/08/06;

PMID: 17361393, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

4/29/1994
6/29/2007
Higher Relevance Score (11)
Lower Relevance Score (9)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2009 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index