|
|
| Research article summary (published 14 Nov 2006): |
Implementation of the Tier 1 Program of the project P.A.T.H.S.: interim evaluation findings.
Full Abstract
To understand the implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S., 25 schools and three school social service units were randomly selected to participate in telephone interviews regarding the quality of the implementation process of the Tier 1 Program of the P.A.T.H.S. Project. In the telephone interviews, the participants described the responses of the students and the workers to the program, the perceived benefits of the program, their assessment of the positive and negative features of the program, as well as difficulties involved in the implementation process. Results showed that most workers perceived that the students had positive responses to the program and half of the workers had positive experiences about the program, although negative comments on the program design and difficulties in the implementation were also recorded. Nearly all workers (97.1%) regarded the program to be beneficial to the students and most of them (78.6%) had positive global evaluation of the project. In short, while the program implementers expressed concerns about the program design and the implementation process, they generally regarded the program as helpful to the students and they had positive global evaluation of the program.
Author information
Author/s: Shek, Daniel T L (DT); Sun, Rachel C F (RC);
Affiliation: Quality of Life Centre, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. danielshek(-atsign-)cuhk.edu.hk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: TheScientificWorldJournal (ScientificWorldJournal), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2006-; vol 6 (issue ) : pp 2274-84
Dates: Created 2007/03/19; Completed 2007/09/04; Revised 2007/11/15;
PMID: 17370022, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- How is success judged in education?
30 Dec 2001 - School-related factors in the implementation of a positive youth development project in Hong Kong.
8 Oct 2008 - Middle school reform through data and dialogue. Collaborative evaluation with 17 leadership teams.
30 Jan 2001 - DMAA: defining quality in health care coordination.
29 Nov 2006 - Health promoting schools and healthy schools awards.
30 Dec 2001 - Helping schools to promote healthy educational environments as new initiatives for school based management: the Hong Kong Healthy Schools Award Scheme.
30 Dec 2001 - Worksite fitness and exercise programs: a review of methodology and health impact.
29 Jun 1996 - [Self-assessment in graduate public health programs: characteristics and constraints]
30 Dec 2007 - ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Evaluation.
13 Feb 2003 - Preparticipation physical evaluations for high school athletes: time for a new game plan.
29 Apr 2004
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.