The influence of achievement goals on the constructive activity of low achievers during collaborative problem solving.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Previous research on small-group learning has found that level of constructive activity (solving or explaining how to solve problems using ideas stated or implied in the explanation provided by a partner) was a better predictor of post-test achievement than either a student's prior achievement or the quality of help received (Webb, Troper, & Fall, 1995).

AIMS:
The purpose of this study was to extend this research by examining the influence of additional factors, in particular, achievement goals and comprehension monitoring, on low achieving students' constructive activity after receiving help from a high achieving peer.

SAMPLE:
Thirty-two low achieving upper elementary students from an urban school district in the mid-west of the United States were paired with high achieving partners.

METHODS:
Videotape data from a previously reported study on peer collaboration were transcribed and reanalyzed. In that study, dyads were randomly assigned instructions designed to induce either a learning or performance goal and were videotaped as they worked together to solve a set of mathematical word problems. The following day, students were individually post-tested on problems similar to the ones worked on in pairs.

RESULTS:
Consistent with previous research, low achieving students' level of constructive activity predicted post-test performance. In addition, constructive activity was found to mediate the relationship between achievement goals and learning. However, achievement goals were not related to low achievers constructive use of help. Instead, achievement goals were related to low achievers' relative accuracy in comprehension monitoring, which in turn was related to level of constructive activity.

CONCLUSIONS:
The meaning of these results for understanding the processes by which low achievers learn from peer help and implications for classroom practice are discussed.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Gabriele, Anthony J (AJ);

Affiliation: Department of Educational Psychology and Foundations, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0607, USA. gabriele@uni.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: The British journal of educational psychology (Br J Educ Psychol), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Mar; vol 77 (issue Pt 1) : pp 121-41

Dates: Created 2007/04/06; Completed 2007/05/23;

PMID: 17411491, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.