A ten-month program in curriculum development for medical educators: 16 years of experience.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND:
Despite increased demand for new curricula in medical education, most academic medical centers have few faculty with training in curriculum development.

OBJECTIVE:
To describe and evaluate a longitudinal mentored faculty development program in curriculum development.

DESIGN:
A 10-month curriculum development program operating one half-day per week of each academic year from 1987 through 2003. The program was designed to provide participants with the knowledge, attitudes, skills, and experience to design, implement, evaluate, and disseminate curricula in medical education using a 6-step model.

PARTICIPANTS:
One-hundred thirty-eight faculty and fellows from Johns Hopkins and other institutions and 63 matched nonparticipants.

MEASUREMENTS:
Pre- and post-surveys from participants and nonparticipants assessed skills in curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation, as well as enjoyment in curriculum development and evaluation. Participants rated program quality, educational methods, and facilitation in a post-program survey.

RESULTS:
Sixty-four curricula were produced addressing gaps in undergraduate, graduate, or postgraduate medical education. At least 54 curricula (84%) were implemented. Participant self-reported skills in curricular development, implementation, and evaluation improved from baseline (p < .0001), whereas no improvement occurred in the comparison group. In multivariable analyses, participants rated their skills and enjoyment at the end of the program significantly higher than nonparticipants (all p < .05). Eighty percent of participants felt that they would use the 6-step model again, and 80% would recommend the program highly to others.

CONCLUSIONS:
This model for training in curriculum development has long-term sustainability and is associated with participant satisfaction, improvement in self-rated skills, and implementation of curricula on important topics.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Windish, Donna M (DM); Gozu, Aysegul (A); Bass, Eric B (EB); Thomas, Patricia A (PA); Sisson, Stephen D (SD); Howard, Donna M (DM); Kern, David E (DE);

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. donna.windish(-atsign-)yale.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article

Journal: Journal of general internal medicine : official journal of the Society for Research and Education in Primary Care Internal Medicine (J Gen Intern Med), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-May; vol 22 (issue 5) : pp 655-61

Dates: Created 2007/04/19; Completed 2007/06/18; Revised 2008/11/20;

PMID: 17443374, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Adult
Curriculum - standards; trends
Data Collection - methods
Education, Medical - methods; standards; trends
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods; standards; trends
Faculty, Medical - standards

Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Mentors
Program Development - standards

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.