Time to think? Questionnaire survey of pre-registration house officers' experiences of critical appraisal in the Mersey Deanery.

Full Abstract

CONTEXT:
Workload pressures may lead pre-registration house officers (PRHOs) to undervalue critical appraisal and thinking skills. This study aimed to explore Mersey Deanery PRHOs' attitudes, experiences and perceived readiness for practising evidence-based medicine with critical appraisal skills.

METHODS:
A cross-sectional survey of 157 PRHOs from 5 postgraduate centres in the UK, using a semistructured questionnaire, at the beginning and end of the pre-registration year. Main outcome measures were level of agreement with closed statements exploring experiences and opinions about critical appraisal skills and evidence-based practice. Open questions explored personal experiences.

RESULTS:
Most PRHOs (69%) felt medical school prepared them to use critical appraisal skills and perceived such skills as relevant (63%). Fewer felt that their clinical work was based on best available evidence (57%). The busier the PRHOs, the less likely they were to agree that their practice followed best evidence. The PRHOs were more likely to feel supported and that their practice was evidence-based at the end of the year. Responders identified several reasons for their practice not being evidence-based, including workload, lack of skills, deferring to senior colleagues, and non-conducive hospital culture.

CONCLUSIONS:
The nature of PRHO work still mitigates against critical thinking and appraising evidence, with a lack of protected time and perceived inconsistent support from educational supervisors. Many PRHOs rely entirely on evidence-based summaries and guidelines from others. The PRHO year is a period of crucial transition, however, and critical appraisal skills and evidence-based approaches need developing post-qualification, with sufficient protected time for their integration into practice. Foundation year reforms reinforce such requirements.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Doran, Tim (T); Maudsley, Gillian (G); Zakhour, Hani (H);

Affiliation: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. tim.doran@man.ac.uk

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Medical education (Med Educ), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-May; vol 41 (issue 5) : pp 487-94

Dates: Created 2007/05/01; Completed 2007/07/10;

PMID: 17470078, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Female
Humans
Male
Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology
Questionnaires
Self Concept

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.