|
|
| Research article summary (published 13 May 2007): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons.
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Current legislation in Canada allows for only altruistic gamete donation. Limited clinical data are available on the emotional and psychological impact of altruistic oocyte donation on known donors.
METHODS:
Seventeen women who had donated oocytes to known parties without financial compensation agreed to receive the oocyte donation questionnaire (ODQ) to explore the psychological domains of altruistic oocyte donation.
RESULTS:
Thirteen ODQ were returned, giving a response rate of 76%. All subjects indicated that they were primarily motivated by a 'desire to give and help' the recipient couple. Most subjects did not find the donation decision difficult but some found the post-donation psychological adjustments challenging. Subjects also indicated that mandatory counselling on the psychological implications of oocyte donation was an important component of cycle preparation. The majority of subjects had disclosed the donation to others and felt that disclosure to the presumptive child was essential.
CONCLUSIONS:
The findings provide clinical materials for conceptualizing the dynamics entailed by known altruistic oocyte donation, with regards to motivation, relationship implications, donor satisfaction and plans for disclosure. The data support the provision of psycho-social support services to help donors dealing with any residual emotional difficulties regardless of the outcome of oocyte donation.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Yee, Samantha (S); Hitkari, Jason A (JA); Greenblatt, Ellen M (EM);
Affiliation: Department of Social Work, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. syee(-atsign-)mtsinai.on.ca
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Human reproduction (Oxford, England) (Hum Reprod), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2007-Jul; vol 22 (issue 7) : pp 2040-50
Dates: Created 2007/06/21; Completed 2007/09/26;
PMID: 17507386, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 12/26/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Some psychological aspects of oocyte donation from known donors on altruistic basis.
30 Jul 1997 - What oocyte donors aren't told?
30 Dec 2000 - Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes.
30 Jan 2000 - Exploring ovum donors' motivations and needs.
30 Dec 2000 - Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment.
29 Jun 1998 - The personal, interpersonal,and political issues of egg donation.
29 Nov 2004 - Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences.
30 May 2004 - How would revealing the identity of gamete donors affect current practice?
29 Apr 2005 - The acceptability of posthumous human ovarian tissue donation in Utah.
7 Sep 2005 - Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study.
11 Nov 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.