|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jul 2007): |
Recent advances in the diagnosis of drug allergy.
Full Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review addresses the most recent literature regarding the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions, which can be classified as immediate or nonimmediate according to the time interval between the last drug administration and the onset. Immediate reactions occur within 1 h; nonimmediate ones occur after more than 1 h. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical and immunological studies suggest that type-I (IgE-mediated) and type-IV (cell-mediated) pathogenic mechanisms are involved in most immediate and nonimmediate reactions, respectively. New diagnostic tools, such as the basophil activation test and the lymphocyte activation test, have been developed and are under validation. SUMMARY: In diagnosis, the patient's history is fundamental; the allergologic examination includes in-vivo and in-vitro tests selected on the basis of the clinical features. Prick, patch, and intradermal tests are the most readily available forms of allergy testing. Determination of specific IgE levels is still the most common in-vitro method for diagnosing immediate reactions. The sensitivity of allergologic tests is not 100%; in selected cases, therefore, provocation tests are necessary. The routine use of the basophil activation test and the lymphocyte activation test could increase the sensitivity of diagnostic work-ups, thus reducing the need for drug provocation tests.
Author information
Author/s: Romano, Antonino (A); Demoly, Pascal (P);
Affiliation: Allergy Unit of Integrated Complex Columbus, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. antoninoromano(-atsign-)h-columbus.it
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Review
Journal: Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology (Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2007-Aug; vol 7 (issue 4) : pp 299-303
Dates: Created 2007/07/10; Completed 2007/09/21;
PMID: 17620820, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Nonimmediate reactions to betalactams.
30 Jul 2007 - Comparison of two basophil activation markers CD63 and CD203c in the diagnosis of amoxicillin allergy.
4 Mar 2008 - Recent advances in the diagnosis of drug allergy.
30 Jul 2001 - [Comments on 198 cases of allergy to pyrazolones]
29 Sep 1985 - Recognizing drug allergy. How to differentiate true allergy from other adverse drug reactions.
29 Apr 2005 - [Difficulties in the biological diagnosis of drug allergies]
30 Oct 1978 - [Allergy to iodinated contrast media]
29 Sep 2002 - The incremental challenge test in the diagnosis of adverse reactions to local anesthetics.
30 Mar 2001 - [Immunological mechanisms of drug allergy]
30 Dec 1979 - Combined immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity to metamizole.
30 Dec 1998
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.