|
|
| Research article summary (published 7 Aug 2007): |
The psychology of meta-ethics: exploring objectivism.
Full Abstract
How do lay individuals think about the objectivity of their ethical beliefs? Do they regard them as factual and objective, or as more subjective and opinion-based, and what might predict such differences? In three experiments, we set out a methodology for assessing the perceived objectivity of ethical beliefs, and use it to document several novel findings. Experiment 1 showed that individuals tend to regard ethical statements as clearly more objective than social conventions and tastes, and almost as objective as scientific facts. Yet, there was considerable variation in objectivism, both across different ethical statements, and across individuals. The extent to which individuals treat ethical beliefs as objective was predicted by the way they grounded their ethical systems. Groundings which emphasize the religious, pragmatic, and self-identity underpinnings of ethical belief each independently predicted greater ethical objectivity. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings with a refined measure of ethical objectivism. Experiment 3 demonstrated the robustness of the religious grounding of ethics, and differentiates it from mere religious belief and from political orientation. The results shed light on the nature of ethical belief, and have implications for the resolution of ethical disputes.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Goodwin, Geoffrey P (GP); Darley, John M (JM);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. ggoodwin@princeton.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Cognition (Cognition), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Mar; vol 106 (issue 3) : pp 1339-66
Dates: Created 2008/02/04; Completed 2008/04/21;
PMID: 17692306, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Jung's mediatory science as a psychology beyond objectivism.
30 Mar 2000 - Memory management: a gathering ethical storm.
29 Apr 2006 - Exploring the gray areas of informed consent.
29 Jun 2000 - Qualitative interviewing: encountering ethical issues and challenges.
30 Dec 2005 - Dementia and the law.
30 Aug 2006 - End-of-life decisions and respiratory disease.
30 Jan 2006 - Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ethics rounds: life-threatening illness and the desire to adopt.
29 Nov 2005 - Practitioner to researcher: reflections on the journey.
30 Dec 2006 - Exploring ethical justification for self-demand amputation.
30 Dec 2005 - Hospital ethics committees: is it time to expand our access to managed care organizations?
30 Dec 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.