|
|
| Research article summary (published 28 Feb 2008): |
A panel interview on the ethical practice of neuropsychology.
Full Abstract
Neuropsychologists who have considerable experience reflecting, presenting, publishing, and advising on ethical matters are a rich resource for clinicians who have ethics questions. Consultation with such colleagues can be an important part of the ethical decision-making process. The purpose of the present article is to provide the opinions and perspectives of three neuropsychologists who, based on their experience and scholarly activities, served as panelists regarding ethical matters. Although the advice and opinions of colleagues are not a substitute for familiarity with relevant ethical requirements, guidelines, and professional literature, they offer valuable information that enhances the ethical decision-making process.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Bush, Shane S (SS); Grote, Christopher L (CL); Johnson-Greene, Doug E (DE); Macartney-Filgate, Michele (M);
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Interview
Journal: The Clinical neuropsychologist (Clin Neuropsychol), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Mar; vol 22 (issue 2) : pp 321-44
Dates: Created 2008/07/01; Completed 2008/08/13;
PMID: 17853148, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Ethical controversies in neuropsychological test selection, administration, and interpretation.
30 Dec 2005 - Ethical issues associated with the assessment of exaggeration, poor effort, and malingering.
30 Dec 2005 - Neurocognitive enhancement: ethical considerations for an emerging subspecialty.
30 Dec 2005 - An ethic of analysis: an argument for critical analysis of research interviews as an ethical practice.
30 Mar 2006 - Ethical dilemmas among nurses as they transition to hospital case management: implications for organizational ethics, part I.
29 Apr 2007 - Ethical dilemmas among nurses as they transition to hospital case management: implications for organizational ethics, part II.
29 Jun 2007 - Applied neuropsychology: special issue ethical controversies in neuropsychology.
30 Dec 2005 - Evaluation of competency: ethical considerations for neuropsychologists.
30 Dec 2005 - A novel framework for reflecting on the functioning of research ethics review panels.
30 Dec 2006 - Medical student selection: choice of a semi-structured panel interview or an unstructured one-on-one interview.
30 Aug 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.