|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Sep 2007): |
Factors influencing implementation of team-based learning in health sciences education.
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited studies have looked at factors that lead to successful implementation of team-based learning (TBL). The purpose of this study was to identify contextual factors associated with implementation of TBL with a larger pool of individuals. METHOD: The authors administered a questionnaire who had implemented TBL via the Web to participants who attended TBL workshops; 297 of 594 responded. We used the constant comparative method to analyze responses. RESULTS: Analysis revealed five factors important to successful implementation of TBL: buy-in, expertise, resources, time, and course characteristics, with 60%, 38%, 37%, 36%, and 16% of respondents identifying each factor, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When health science faculty and administrators implement TBL or other educational innovations, they must have buy-in, ensure adequate time and resources, develop needed expertise, and determine best fit within a course. Although these results are specific to TBL, they are consistent with models of dissemination and have implications for other educational innovations.
Author information
Author/s: Thompson, Britta M (BM); Schneider, Virginia F (VF); Haidet, Paul (P); Perkowski, Linda C (LC); Richards, Boyd F (BF);
Affiliation: Office of Curriculum, M301, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. brittat(-atsign-)bcm.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges (Acad Med), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2007-Oct; vol 82 (issue 10 Suppl) : pp S53-6
Dates: Created 2007/09/26; Completed 2007/11/01;
PMID: 17895691, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.
Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.
Related articles
These are the most related articles currently in our database:
- Recent medical graduates as facilitators in a PBL curriculum.
30 Oct 2006 - Is the new White Paper for higher education feasible?
29 Apr 2005 - An unconventional teaching-learning tool for undergraduates.
30 Dec 2005 - Facilitating learning groups in CME.
4 Mar 2004 - Problem-based learning--time to step back?
29 Jun 2000 - SCORPIO: a system of medical teaching.
30 Dec 1991 - UK proposes preclinical distance learning course.
Apr 1999 - Flexner's ethical oversight reprised? Contemporary medical education and the health impacts of corporate globalisation.
29 Sep 2005 - Horizontal integration in teaching within a biomedical department.
30 Oct 2005 - Peer-guided cooperative learning enhances the performance of refresher students.
27 Feb 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a larger map of 100+ related articles.