Regulating scientific research: should scientists be left alone?

Full Abstract

In our current political climate, decisions about whether to fund research on new stem cell lines or do chimera experiments seem to arbitrarily depend on the religious and economic interests of the administration. Not unreasonably, many scientists believe that science should be left to its own devices in determining research priorities and conducting research. When nonscientific considerations constrain research, it is claimed that values are inappropriately dictating scientific decisions. This assumes, however, that all ethical and social values are irrelevant to such decisions. Using the case of embryonic stem cell research to illustrate the debate, we argue here that this position is untenable for several reasons. First, the aims of science, particularly in the case of the biomedical sciences, cannot be completely extricated from ethical and social aims. Hence, value judgments will be necessary to assess research priorities and methodologies. Second, maintaining this position is inconsistent with actual scientific practices. Scientists already recognize that there are some ethical values that appropriately constrain research, such as in human subject experimentation. Therefore, the problem cannot be that ethical values are brought to bear on science per se but that those values are highly questionable or are imposed by those who often lack the scientific expertise necessary to understand how ethical concerns may relate to the research. Finally, we argue that to the extent value judgments must be made, consensus about such values should be reached by a diverse group of stakeholders, including scientists, community members, policymakers, and ethicists.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Intemann, Kristen K (KK); de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada (I);

Affiliation: Department of History and Philosophy, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: The FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB J), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2008-Mar; vol 22 (issue 3) : pp 654-8

Dates: Created 2008/02/29; Completed 2008/04/10;

PMID: 17928363, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Biomedical Research - ethics; legislation & jurisprudence; trends
Embryonic Stem Cells
Ethics
Humans

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

Stop misbehaving! 29 Jun 2006
Reconciling scientists' beliefs about radiation risks and social norms: explaining preferred radiation protection standards. 30 May 2007
A tale of two studies; ethics, bioterrorism, and the censorship of science. 29 Apr 2007
An ontology for a Robot Scientist. 13 Jul 2006
[Impact factor and/or Hirsch index?] 4 May 2007
Theory and data interactions of the scientific mind: evidence from the molecular and the cognitive laboratory. 30 May 2004
Borna disease virus: the generation and review of a scientific study. 11 Mar 2006
Scientific rationality, uncertainty and the governance of human genetics: an interview study with researchers at deCODE genetics. 17 Apr 2006
An overlooked source of physician-scientists. 29 Nov 2007

See 100+ related articles.