A reliable and valid instrument to assess competency in basic surgical skills in second-year medical students.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite calls for competency based education, a dearth of validated instruments for measuring basic skills currently exists. We developed an instrument to assess competency in basic surgical skills in second-year medical students and tested it for psychometric reliability and validity. METHODS: From a review of the literature, an instrument comprised of numerically scaled items was constructed. After initial tests, several items were divided to produce a final instrument more specific and more appropriate for providing feedback to students. The final instrument was empirically tested for reliability and validity. RESULTS: The final 10-item instrument is presented here along with all of the empirical evidence including internal consistency reliability and interrater reliability, and content, criterion-related, and construct validity. Overall alpha reliability was 0.84 and interrater reliability was r = 0.83, P < 0.01 for the total scores. Factor analysis provided evidence of construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument has psychometric properties adequate for use as one criterion for summative evaluation and is educationally practical enough to provide focused and detailed feedback for student improvement.

Author information

Author/s: Bramson, Rachel (R); Sadoski, Mark (M); Sanders, Charles W (CW); van Walsum, Kim (K); Wiprud, Robert (R);

Affiliation: Department of Family and Community Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, College of Medicine, College Station, TX 77843, USA. bramson(-atsign-)medicine.tamhsc.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Validation Studies

Journal: Southern medical journal (South Med J), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Oct; vol 100 (issue 10) : pp 985-90

Dates: Created 2007/10/18; Completed 2007/11/08; Revised 2008/11/21;

PMID: 17943041, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.