A prospective, randomized, parallel group, controlled study of the effect of intensity of speech and language therapy on early recovery from poststroke aphasia.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the amount of speech and language therapy influences the recovery from poststroke aphasia. SETTING: A hospital stroke unit and community. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTION: Aphasic stroke patients were randomly allocated to receive 5 hours (intensive therapy group, n=51) or 2 hours (standard therapy group) of speech and language therapy per week for 12 consecutive weeks starting as soon as practicable after the stroke. Another 19 patients were recruited for 2 hours per week of therapy and were treated by National Health Service (NHS) staff (NHS group). OUTCOME MEASURE AND ASSESSMENT: The Western Aphasia Battery. Assessments were made blind to randomization at baseline and 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks after the start of therapy. Data were analysed by intention to treat. RESULTS: The mean (SD) Western Aphasia Battery score at week 12 for the intensive, standard and NHS groups was 70.3 (26.9), 66.2 (26.2) and 58.1 (33.7), respectively. There was no treatment effect of intensive therapy (P > 0.05), but there was a statistically significant difference between the standard study and the NHS groups (P = 0.002 at week 12 and 0.01 at week 24). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive speech and language therapy (as delivered in this study) did not improve the language impairment significantly more than the ;standard' therapy which averaged 1.6 hours/week. The improvement in aphasia was least in patients who were in the NHS group. These patients received 0.57 (0.49) hours of therapy per week.

Author information

Author/s: Bakheit, A M O (AM); Shaw, S (S); Barrett, L (L); Wood, J (J); Carrington, S (S); Griffiths, S (S); Searle, K (K); Koutsi, F (F);

Affiliation: Stroke Unit, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth, UK. magid.bakheit(-atsign-)pcs-tr.swest.nhs.uk

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Clinical rehabilitation (Clin Rehabil), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-Oct; vol 21 (issue 10) : pp 885-94

Dates: Created 2007/11/05; Completed 2008/01/10;

PMID: 17981847, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.