The spiral curriculum: implications for online learning.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an apparent disjuncture between the requirements of the medical spiral curriculum and the practice of replacing previous online material in undergraduate courses. This paper investigates the extent to which students revisit previous online material for the purposes of building the educational spiral, and the implications for the implementation of a Faculty's Learning Management System implementation. METHODS: At the University of Cape Town, medical students' last date of access to 16 previous online courses was determined. Students completed a survey to determine their reasons for revisiting this material and the perceived benefits of this availability. RESULTS: 70% of the students revisited their previous online courses. The major reasons were to review lecture presentations, lectures notes, and quizzes. The perceived benefits were for understanding new material, preparation for assessments, and convenience. Although student comments were not always in line with the concept of the spiral curriculum, most referred to processes of building on previous work, and some mentioned the spiral curriculum specifically. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the practice of replacing previous online courses may hinder rather than support student learning. Although students visit previous material for ranges of reasons, a large number are aware of the spiral curriculum, and use the online environment to build upon previous material. Any practice, which entails replacing material and redesigning curricula content may be detrimental to the students' future learning needs, and such activities may need revision.

Author information

Author/s: Masters, Kenneth (K); Gibbs, Trevor (T);

Affiliation: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Ken.Masters(-atsign-)uct.ac.za

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: BMC medical education (BMC Med Educ), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2007-; vol 7 (issue ) : pp 52

Dates: Created 2008/02/08; Completed 2008/02/14; Revised 2009/11/03;

PMID: 18154654, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/3/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.