|
|
| Research article summary (published 2008): |
Response style differences in the inattentive and combined subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Full Abstract
This study examined potential differences between the inattentive and combined ADHD subtypes using laboratory tasks assessing behavioral inhibitory processes. Seventy-five children completed two tasks of behavioral inhibition believed to isolate different processes: the cued reaction time task (CRT), a basic inhibition task, and the go/no-go task (GNG), a complex inhibition task that incorporates motivational contingencies. Three groups of participants were identified, including ADHD/Inattentive (n = 17), ADHD/Combined (n = 37), and comparison (n = 21). Results indicated that rather than showing behavioral inhibition deficits, the ADHD/I children appeared overly inhibited, as evidenced by slower reaction times across the two tasks and significantly higher errors of omission in the GNG task. Additionally, the ADHD/I children did not demonstrate cue dependency effects on the CRT task, suggesting that they were failing to incorporate relevant information before making a response. The sluggish and inhibited performance of the ADHD/I group challenges the idea that it is a subtype of ADHD.
Author information
Author/s: Derefinko, Karen J (KJ); Adams, Zachary W (ZW); Milich, Richard (R); Fillmore, Mark T (MT); Lorch, Elizabeth P (EP); Lynam, Donald R (DR);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, 202A Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY, 40506-0044, USA.
Grants: DA005312 (Agency:NIDA NIH HHS) ; DA021027 (Agency:NIDA NIH HHS)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Journal: Journal of abnormal child psychology (J Abnorm Child Psychol), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jul; vol 36 (issue 5) : pp 745-58
Dates: Created 2008/05/29; Completed 2008/11/04;
PMID: 18175214, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- How well do measures of inhibition and other executive functions discriminate between children with ADHD and controls?
28 Feb 2004 - Inhibitory performance, response speed, intraindividual variability, and response accuracy in ADHD.
29 Jun 2008 - [Neuropsychological performance in ADHD and tic-disorders: a prospective 1-year follow-up]
30 Dec 2005 - Continuous Performance Test (CPT) of college students with ADHD, psychiatric disorders, cognitive deficits, or no diagnosis.
30 Jan 2007 - [What is the value of the Conners Teacher Questionnaire for clinical research and practice?]
30 Jul 1997 - [Tools for the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Self-rating behaviour questionnaire and diagnostic checklist]
30 Aug 2004 - Distinguishing anxiety disorders psychometrically.
29 Nov 1997 - Support for an independent familial segregation of executive and intelligence endophenotypes in ADHD families.
6 Feb 2008 - Neuropsychological executive functions and DSM-IV ADHD subtypes.
30 Dec 2001 - Is the Continuous Performance Task useful in research with ADHD children? Comments on a review.
30 Oct 1995
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.