|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Dec 2007): |
Cost-effectiveness of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus human FSH in intrauterine insemination cycles: a statistical model-derived analysis.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Recently we proposed a randomized trial specifically designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two different protocols of stimulation in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. Computer-simulated clinical models have been developed to perform pharmacoeconomic studies, creating a decision tree in which the complex procedure is performed and repeated. The present study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and human-derived FSH (hFSH) in ovarian stimulation and to indicate which protocol should be used in IUI cycles.
STUDY DESIGN:
Two computer-generated decision tree models were constructed to compare the clinical effects and costs of rFSH versus hFSH in IUI cycles. A first decision tree model was built according to the trial previously published. In a second model, 10 000 hypothetical infertile patients were entered in a computer-generated simulation and were stimulated with two different protocols for IUI. IUI was hypothetically performed in both groups of patients with a known pregnancy, cancellation, miscarriage and abandonment rate. The two protocols were compared using a cost-effective analysis:
cost-effectiveness ratios (CE) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) was constructed.
RESULTS:
The overall estimated costs with each ovarian stimulation strategy in the first model demonstrated that rFSH was a less cost-effective strategy, with an ICER of euro 13,727. The CEAC showed that at a level of euro 0 of willingness to pay, hFSH was cost-effective in 73% of the samples while rFSH was cost-effective in 27% only. Recombinant FSH would be more cost-effective than hFSH at an effectiveness threshold of 0.170 and at a cost per cycle of euro 235. This finding was also confirmed by the acceptability curve obtained with 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, in which hFSH was cost-effective in about 96-98% of samples at any threshold of willingness to pay.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study represents the first statistical model developed with a computer-generated clinical simulation with the intent to elaborate a pharmacoeconomic comparison between rFSH and hFSH in ovarian stimulation for IUI cycles. Results demonstrated that hFSH is more cost-effective than rFSH.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Gerli, Sandro (S); Bini, Vittorio (V); Di Renzo, Gian Carlo (GC);
Affiliation: Department of Medical-Surgical Specialties and Public Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. gerber(-atsign-)unipg.it
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology (Gynecol Endocrinol), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jan; vol 24 (issue 1) : pp 18-23
Dates: Created 2008/01/28; Completed 2008/04/15;
PMID: 18224540, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Cost-effectiveness of aromatase inhibitor co-treatment for controlled ovarian stimulation.
25 Jul 2006 - Preventing high-order multiple pregnancies during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination: 3 years' experience using low-dose recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists.
27 Feb 2006 - Effect of GnRH antagonists in FSH mildly stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles: a multicentre randomized trial.
22 Oct 2006 - Comparison of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination cycles for the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized study.
3 Sep 2006 - Recombinant versus highly-purified, urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH vs. HP-uFSH) in ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized study with cost-minimization analysis.
16 Jul 2006 - [Health economic consequences of the choice of follicle stimulating hormone alternatives in IVF treatment]
31 Mar 2007 - A randomized clinical trial of clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility.
14 Nov 2006 - Randomized controlled trial comparing superovulation with letrozole versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone combined with intrauterine insemination for couples with unexplained infertility who had failed clomiphene citrate stimulation and intrauterine insemination.
23 Oct 2007 - Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists to overcome the drawbacks of intrauterine insemination on weekends.
27 Feb 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.