|
|
| Research article summary (published 4 Feb 2008): |
Cultural variation in values attached to informed choice in the context of prenatal diagnosis.
Full Abstract
One of the ethical implications of the widespread introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) is that it might undermine the making of informed choices. There is an almost universal agreement among health professionals and policy makers that prenatal testing decisions should reflect informed choices. It is, however, unclear the extent to which this is a universally held value. We present evidence to suggest that although informed choice is highly valued in Western, individualistically orientated countries, it is less highly valued in non-Western, more collectivist countries. This raises questions as to whether it is beneficial - and indeed appropriate - to recommend facilitating informed choices in countries where this is not a dominant value.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: van den Heuvel, Ananda (A); Marteau, Theresa M (TM);
Affiliation: King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychology at Guy's, Health Psychology Section, 5th Floor, Thomas Guy House, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine (Semin Fetal Neonatal Med), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Apr; vol 13 (issue 2) : pp 99-102
Dates: Created 2008/02/12; Completed 2008/07/22;
PMID: 18255366, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening?
29 Apr 2005 - Undergoing prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: presentation of choice and information in Europe and Asia.
19 Feb 2007 - Low uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in minority ethnic groups and socially deprived groups: a reflection of women's attitudes or a failure to facilitate informed choices?
26 Feb 2005 - Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
18 Oct 2005 - [The informed choice has difficult conditions]
3 Mar 2007 - Informed choice in women attending private clinics to undergo first-trimester screening for Down syndrome.
30 Jul 2005 - [Is informed consent actually possible?]
30 Oct 2006 - Are pregnant Australian women well informed about prenatal genetic screening? A systematic investigation using the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice.
29 Sep 2006 - Family-centered care in the context of fetal abnormality.
29 Jun 2006 - [QF-PCR or karyotyping in amniocentesis most often not the woman's decision. Difficult to give basis for an informed choice]
30 Aug 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.