|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Dec 2008): |
Redistribution or horizontal equity in Hong Kong's mixed public-private health system: a policy conundrum.
Full Abstract
We examine the distributional characteristics of Hong Kong's mixed public-private health system to identify the net redistribution achieved through public spending on health care, compare the income-related inequality and inequity of public and private care and measure horizontal inequity in health-care delivery overall. Payments for public care are highly concentrated on the better-off whereas benefits are pro-poor. As a consequence, public health care effects significant net redistribution from the rich to the poor. Public care is skewed towards the poor in part not only because of allocation according to need but also because the rich opt out of the public sector and consume most of the private care. Overall, there is horizontal inequity favouring the rich in general outpatient care and (very marginally) inpatient care. Pro-rich bias in the distribution of private care outweighs the pro-poor bias of public care. A lesser role for private finance may improve horizontal equity of utilisation but would also reduce the degree of net redistribution through the public sector. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Author information
Author/s: Leung, Gabriel M (GM); Tin, Keith Y K (KY); O'Donnell, Owen (O);
Affiliation: Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China. gmleung(-atsign-)hku.hk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Health economics (Health Econ), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Jan; vol 18 (issue 1) : pp 37-54
Dates: Created 2008/12/16; Completed 2009/03/03; Revised 2009/07/17;
PMID: 18264997, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 7/25/2009)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.
Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.
Related articles
These are the most related articles currently in our database:
- Public/private financing in the Greek health care system: implications for equity.
30 Jan 1998 - Reform of health care financing systems.
30 Mar 2008 - What can developing economies learn from health system reforms of developed countries?
30 Mar 1995 - Cats and categories: public and private in Canadian healthcare.
30 Dec 2003 - Private sector health reform in South Africa.
30 May 1998 - The public/private debate in the funding, administration and delivery of healthcare in Canada.
30 Dec 2003 - Public/private pragmatism.
30 Dec 2003 - The big thing we haven't done yet.
30 Dec 2003 - Managing a pluralist health system: the case of health care reform in France.
30 Dec 1993 - A cautionary note on market reforms in health care.
30 Oct 1995
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a larger map of 100+ related articles.