|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Dec 2007): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material.
Full Abstract
Student response systems (clickers) are viewed positively by students and instructors in numerous studies. Evidence that clickers enhance student learning is more variable. After becoming comfortable with the technology during fall 2005-spring 2006, we compared student opinion and student achievement in two different courses taught with clickers in fall 2006. One course was an introductory biology class for nonmajors, and the other course was a 200 level genetics class for biology majors. Students in both courses had positive opinions of the clickers, although we observed some interesting differences between the two groups of students. Student performance was significantly higher on exam questions covering material taught with clickers, although the differences were more dramatic for the nonmajors biology course than the genetics course. We also compared retention of information 4 mo after the course ended, and we saw increased retention of material taught with clickers for the nonmajors course, but not for the genetics course. We discuss the implications of our results in light of differences in how the two courses were taught and differences between science majors and nonmajors.
Author information
Author/s: Crossgrove, Kirsten (K); Curran, Kristen L (KL);
Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Whitewater, WI 53190, USA. currank(-atsign-)uww.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: CBE life sciences education (CBE Life Sci Educ), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-; vol 7 (issue 1) : pp 146-54
Dates: Created 2008/03/04; Completed 2008/04/10; Revised 2008/11/20;
PMID: 18316817, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Asking for help.
30 Aug 2003 - Analysis of protein localization and secretory pathway function using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
30 Dec 2001 - Students' studying and approaches to learning in introductory biology.
30 Dec 2003 - From the National Academies.
30 Dec 2002 - Glow lights up Scottish classrooms.
31 Dec 2008 - Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses.
30 Dec 2006 - Points of view: lectures: can't learn with them, can't learn without them.
30 Dec 2003 - Making biology learning relevant to students: integrating people, history, and context into college biology teaching.
30 Dec 2007 - Academic writing.
30 May 2008 - Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes.
30 Dec 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.