|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jan 2008): |
Matching-to-sample by pigeons: the dissociation of comparison choice frequency from the probability of reinforcement.
Full Abstract
It has been proposed that comparison choice in matching-to-sample should depend on two factors, the relative probability of reinforcement associated with each of the comparison stimuli and the conditional probability of each comparison stimulus being correct given presentation of one of the samples. DiGian and Zentall [DiGian, K.A., Zentall, T.R., 2007. Matching-to-sample in pigeons:
in the absence of sample memory, sample frequency is a better predictor of comparison choice than the probability of reinforcement for comparison choice. Learn Behav. 35, 242-261] have shown that sample frequency together with the probability of choosing each of the comparison stimuli in training can influence comparison choice when delays are introduced, when the number of reinforcements associated with each of the comparison stimuli is equated. Furthermore, Zentall and Clement [Zentall, T.R., Clement, T.S., 2002. Memory mechanisms in pigeons:
Evidence of base-rate neglect. J. Exp. Psych.:
Anim. Behav. Proc. 28, 111-115] have found that sample frequency can affect comparison choice when delays are introduced independently of the number of choices of each of the comparison stimuli in training and the number of reinforcements associated with each of the comparison stimuli is equated. In the present experiment we found that the probability of choosing each of the comparison stimuli in training can affect comparison choice when delays are introduced, independently of sample frequency and when the number of reinforcements associated with each of the comparison stimuli is equated. Together, these experiments suggest that when the sample is not available, there is a partial dissociation between comparison choice and the probability of reinforcement associated with each of the comparison stimuli.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Zentall, Thomas R (TR); Singer, Rebecca A (RA); Miller, Holly C (HC);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, United States. zentall(-atsign-)uky.edu
Grants: MH-063726 (Agency:United States NIMH) ; MH-077450 (Agency:United States NIMH)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Journal: Behavioural processes (Behav Processes), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jun; vol 78 (issue 2) : pp 185-90
Dates: Created 2008/04/28; Completed 2008/07/25;
PMID: 18325692, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Matching-to-sample in pigeons: in the absence of sample memory, sample frequency is a better predictor of comparison choice than the probability of reinforcement for comparison choice.
30 Oct 2007 - On the effects of signaling reinforcer probability and magnitude in delayed matching to sample.
27 Feb 2005 - Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.
30 Jul 2007 - Pigeons' choices between fixed-interval and random-interval schedules: utility of variability?
27 Feb 2005 - Teaching pigeons to commit base-rate neglect.
29 Sep 2005 - Resistance to change of forgetting functions and response rates.
29 Jun 2005 - Divided attention and the matching law: sample duration affects sensitivity to reinforcement allocation.
30 Jul 2007 - Post-choice information processing by pigeons.
Mar 2005 - Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
29 Oct 2006 - Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
6 Feb 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.