Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 30 Mar 2008):

Use of goal attainment scaling in inpatient rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
To use goal attainment scaling (GAS) to measure clinically important functional change in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) and to assess its responsiveness compared with standard measures used to evaluate progress in rehabilitation.

DESIGN:
Prospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING:
Tertiary inpatient rehabilitation unit in Victoria, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS:
Consecutive sample of 24 persons with MS admitted for comprehensive rehabilitation program. The male-to-female ratio was 10:14, and the mean age +/- standard deviation was 52.0+/-8.3 years (range, 37-62y). Over half (n=14 [58.3%]) had secondary progressive MS.

INTERVENTIONS:
Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
GAS scores were calculated for 5 to 10 priority goals set prospectively by each patient in agreement with the multidisciplinary treating team and compared with standard outcome measures-the FIM instrument and Barthel Index-rated on admission and discharge from the program. Patients were categorized into responders and nonresponders based on an overall clinical global impression.

RESULTS:
Of 203 selected goals, 167 were achieved at the predicted level. GAS recorded outcomes for 105 individualized goals not measured by the FIM and Barthel Index. Although all 3 measures showed statistically significant change from admission to discharge (P<.001), only GAS scores strongly correlated with the Clinical Global Impression scale (rho=-.86, P<.001). GAS discharge scores differed significantly between the responder and nonresponder groups (Mann-Whitney, z=-3.78, P<.001). Different measures of effect size gave different results, but GAS was consistently more responsive than either the FIM or Barthel Index.

CONCLUSIONS:
This preliminary study suggests that GAS is a responsive and useful outcome measure for the rehabilitation of persons with MS, providing added value to standardized outcome measurement.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Khan, Fary (F); Pallant, Julie F (JF); Turner-Stokes, Lynn (L);

Affiliation: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Melbourne, and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne VIC, Australia. fary.khan(-atsign-)mh.org.au

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Arch Phys Med Rehabil), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2008-Apr; vol 89 (issue 4) : pp 652-9

Dates: Created 2008/03/31; Completed 2008/04/30;

PMID: 18373995, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

4/29/2005
4/29/2008
Higher Relevance Score (464/1000)
Lower Relevance Score (385/1000)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2008 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index