|
|
| Research article summary (published 19 Mar 2008): |
The stay/switch model describes choice among magnitudes of reinforcers.
Full Abstract
The stay/switch model is an alternative to the generalized matching law for describing choice in concurrent procedures. The purpose of the present experiment was to extend this model to choice among magnitudes of reinforcers. Rats were exposed to conditions in which the magnitude of reinforcers (number of food pellets) varied for staying at alternative 1, switching from alternative 1, staying at alternative 2 and switching from alternative 2. A changeover delay was not used. The results showed that the stay/switch model provided a good account of the data overall, and deviations from fits of the generalized matching law to response allocation data were in the direction predicted by the stay/switch model. In addition, comparisons among specific conditions suggested that varying the ratio of obtained reinforcers, as in the generalized matching law, was not necessary to change the response and time allocations. Other comparisons suggested that varying the ratio of obtained reinforcers was not sufficient to change response allocation. Taken together these results provide additional support for the stay/switch model of concurrent choice.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: MacDonall, James S (JS);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458, United States. jmacdonall(-atsign-)fordham.edu
Grants: MH81266 (Agency:United States NIMH) ; R15 MH081266-01 (Agency:United States NIMH)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Behavioural processes (Behav Processes), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jun; vol 78 (issue 2) : pp 173-84
Dates: Created 2008/04/28; Completed 2008/07/25;
PMID: 18406545, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Some effects of overall rate of earning reinforcers on run lengths and visit durations.
11 Mar 2006 - Momentary maximizing and optimal foraging theories of performance on concurrent VR schedules.
5 Mar 2006 - Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys.
30 Oct 2005 - Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?
27 Feb 2005 - Effects of alternative reinforcer and craving on the choice to smoke cigarettes in the laboratory.
30 Dec 2006 - Choice between single and multiple reinforcers in concurrent-chains schedules.
30 Aug 2006 - [Experimental test of the ideal free distribution in humans: the effects of reinforcer magnitude and group size]
30 Jan 2006 - Basolateral amygdala lesions and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in concurrent chains schedules.
25 Mar 2008 - Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.
30 Aug 2005 - Effects of altering reinforcer magnitude and reinforcement schedule on phencyclidine (PCP) self-administration in monkeys using an adjusting delay task.
29 Sep 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.