|
|
| Research article summary (published 11 Jul 2008): |
|
Free Full Text! See links below |
A method of assessing the sensitivity of the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test to an unobserved confounder.
Full Abstract
Observational studies, including the case-control design frequently used in epidemiology, are subject to a number of biases and possible confounding factors. Failure to adjust with them may lead to an erroneous conclusion about the existence of a causal relationship between exposure and disease. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test is widely used to measure the strength of the association between an exposure and disease or response, after stratifying on the observed covariates. Thus, observed confounders are accounted for in the analysis. In practice, there may be causal variables that are unknown or difficult to obtain. Hence, they are not incorporated into the analysis. Sensitivity analysis enables investigators to assess the robustness of the findings. A method for assessing the sensitivity of the CMH test to an omitted confounder is presented here. The technique is illustrated by re-examining two datasets:
one concerns the effect of maternal hypertension as a risk factor for low birth weight infants and the other focuses on the risk of allopurinol on having a rash. The computer code performing the sensitivity analysis is provided in appendix A.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Yu, Binbing (B); Gastwirth, Joseph L (JL);
Affiliation: Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography and Biometry, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. yubi(-atsign-)mail.nih.gov
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Journal: Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences (Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jul; vol 366 (issue 1874) : pp 2377-88
Dates: Created 2008/05/22; Completed 2008/08/13;
PMID: 18407900, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Can patients with epilepsy predict their seizures?
21 Jan 2007 - Diazinon in surface waters before and after a federally-mandated ban.
30 Oct 2005 - [Application of four procedures for detecting differential item functioning in polytomous items]
29 Apr 2007 - Significance of genetic abnormalities of p53 protein in Slovenian patients with gastric carcinoma.
30 Mar 2007 - Generalization of the Mantel-Haenszel estimating function for sparse clustered binary data.
29 Nov 2005 - Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
12 Mar 2008 - Longitudinal study of mortality predictors in Parkinson's disease in Nigerians.
29 Nov 2005 - Thrombophilias and adverse pregnancy outcome - A confounded problem!
30 Dec 2007 - Delayed versus immediate surgical intervention and prostate cancer outcome.
27 Feb 2006 - Meta-analysis of suicide-related behavior events in patients treated with atomoxetine.
30 Jan 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.