|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2008): |
Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. A randomized clinical trial.
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that the two-incision total hip arthroplasty technique provides quicker recovery than other methods do. To date, however, there have been no studies that have directly compared the two-incision technique with another method in similar groups of patients managed with the same advanced anesthetic and rehabilitation protocol. We posed the hypothesis that patients managed with two-incision total hip arthroplasty would recover faster than those managed with mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty and designed a randomized controlled trial specifically (1) to determine if patients recovered faster after two-incision total hip arthroplasty than after mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty as measured on the basis of the attainment of functional milestones that reflect activities of daily living, (2) to determine if the general health outcome after two-incision total hip arthroplasty was better than that after mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty as measured with Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores, and (3) to evaluate the surgical complexity of the two procedures on the basis of the operative time and the prevalence of early complications. METHODS: Between November 2004 and January 2006, seventy-two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomized to two treatment groups: one group was managed with the two-incision technique, and the other group was managed with the mini-posterior-incision technique. The two-incision group comprised thirty-six patients (twenty men and sixteen women) with a mean age of sixty-seven years and mean body mass index of 28.7. The mini-posterior-incision group comprised thirty-six patients (twenty men and sixteen women) with a mean age of sixty-six years and a mean body mass index of 30.2. All patients received the same design of uncemented acetabular and femoral components and were managed with the same comprehensive perioperative pain management and rapid rehabilitation protocol. Operative times and complications were recorded. At two months and one year, all patients were assessed with regard to functional outcome and general health outcome. RESULTS: The patients in the two-incision group recovered more slowly than did those in the mini-posterior-incision group as measured on the basis of the mean time to discontinue a walker or crutches, to discontinue all walking aids, and to return to normal daily activities. The clinical outcome as measured on the basis of the SF-12 scores was similar at both two months and one year postoperatively. The two-incision total hip arthroplasty was a more complex surgical procedure, with a mean operative time that was twenty-four minutes longer; however, the rate of complications (2.8%; one of thirty-six) was the same in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis that the two-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty would substantially improve the short-term recovery after total hip arthroplasty compared with the mini-posterior incision technique was not proved; instead, the patients managed with the mini-posterior-incision technique had the quicker recovery.
Author information
Author/s: Pagnano, Mark W (MW); Trousdale, Robert T (RT); Meneghini, R Michael (RM); Hanssen, Arlen D (AD);
Affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume (J Bone Joint Surg Am), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-May; vol 90 (issue 5) : pp 1000-6
Dates: Created 2008/05/02; Completed 2008/06/03;
PMID: 18451391, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.
Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.
Related articles
These are the most related articles currently in our database:
- The mini-incision hip: building a ship in a bottle.
30 Jan 2004 - Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results.
10 Oct 2006 - A two-incision approach: promises and pitfalls.
30 Aug 2005 - Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study.
18 Apr 2007 - Inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation after hip fracture for residents of nursing homes: a randomised trial.
28 Feb 2008 - Two-year experience using a limited-incision direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty.
29 Nov 2006 - Unrestricted weight bearing and intensive physiotherapy after uncemented total hip arthroplasty.
30 Dec 2005 - Fractured neck of femur in the mobile independent elderly patient: should we treat with total hip replacement?
29 Nov 2003 - The Stolzalpe technique: a modified Watson-Jones approach.
30 Jul 2007 - Return to mountain sports after minimally invasive two-incision hip arthroplasty.
30 Dec 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a larger map of 100+ related articles.