|
|
| Research article summary (published 16 May 2008): |
Decision-making with multiple alternatives.
Full Abstract
Simple perceptual tasks have laid the groundwork for understanding the neurobiology of decision-making. Here, we examined this foundation to explain how decision-making circuitry adjusts in the face of a more difficult task. We measured behavioral and physiological responses of monkeys on a two- and four-choice direction-discrimination decision task. For both tasks, firing rates in the lateral intraparietal area appeared to reflect the accumulation of evidence for or against each choice. Evidence accumulation began at a lower firing rate for the four-choice task, but reached a common level by the end of the decision process. The larger excursion suggests that the subjects required more evidence before making a choice. Furthermore, on both tasks, we observed a time-dependent rise in firing rates that may impose a deadline for deciding. These physiological observations constitute an effective strategy for handling increased task difficulty. The differences appear to explain subjects' accuracy and reaction times.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Churchland, Anne K (AK); Kiani, Roozbeh (R); Shadlen, Michael N (MN);
Affiliation: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, National Primate Research Center, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. anne99(-atsign-)u.washington.edu
Grants: EY011378 (Agency:United States NEI) ; RR00166 (Agency:United States NCRR) ; (Agency:United States Howard Hughes Medical Institute)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Nature neuroscience (Nat Neurosci), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jun; vol 11 (issue 6) : pp 693-702
Dates: Created 2008/05/28; Completed 2008/08/13;
PMID: 18488024, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
Comments and Corrections
CommentIn: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jun;11(6):623-4. (PMID: 18506135)
ErratumIn: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jul;11(7):851.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Rawlsian decisionmaking and genetic engineering.
30 Dec 2005 - Has the emphasis on autonomy gone too far? Insights from Dostoevsky on parental decisionmaking in the NICU.
30 Dec 2005 - Shattering the neutral surrogate myth in end-of-life decisionmaking: Terri Schiavo and her family.
30 Dec 2003 - Shattering the neutral surrogate myth in end-of-life decisionmaking: Terri Schiavo and her family.
29 Jun 2006 - "Demoralization" and decisionmaking: psychiatry again at the forefront.
30 Oct 2004 - The semblance of autonomy: treatment of persons with disabilities under the Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act.
30 Dec 2005 - Evidence and effectiveness in decisionmaking for quarantine.
3 Apr 2007 - The makings of a good meeting.
30 Oct 2007 - Essay: The makings of the perfect athlete.
29 Nov 2005 - [Deleted Record]
29 Jun 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.