Caring for risky patients: duty or virtue?

Full Abstract

The emergence several years ago of SARS, with its high rate of infection and death among healthcare workers, resurrected a recurring ethical question: do health professionals have a duty to provide care to patients with deadly infectious diseases, even at some substantial risk to themselves and their families? The conventional answer, repeated on the heels of the SARS epidemic, is that they do. In this paper, I argue that the arguments in support of such a duty are wanting in significant respects, and that the language of duty is simply not adequate to an understanding of all the moral dimensions of professional responses to the care of risky patients. Instead, we should speak the language of virtues and ideals if we want to do justice to the complexity of such harrowing circumstances.

Author information

Author/s: Tomlinson, T (T);

Affiliation: Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, C208 E Fee, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. tomlins4(-atsign-)msu.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Journal of medical ethics (J Med Ethics), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2008-Jun; vol 34 (issue 6) : pp 458-62

Dates: Created 2008/05/30; Completed 2008/11/04;

PMID: 18511620, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.