Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 14 Jun 2008):

Video assessment of basic surgical trainees' operative skills.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND:
We previously described a feasible, reliable, valid, and acceptable clinical assessment form for basic surgical trainees (BSTs). We now recently assessed tissue-handling skills using real-time assessment (RTA) and video assessment (VA) and addressed feasibility, reliability, validity, and trainer-trainee agreement using the same assessment form.

METHODS:
Nine BSTs were videotaped as they performed open inguinal hernia repairs at 6 and 12 months of surgical training. Edited videotapes were independently rated by 7 consultants and 5 trainees using the technical part of the Edinburgh BST Assessment Form (EBSTAF-Tech), the Toronto Global Rating Scale of Surgical Performance (Toronto scale), and a visual analogue scale.

RESULTS:
RTA and VA both proved to be reliable tools (RTA alpha > or = .85; VA alpha > or = .76; interclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > or = .69, rho > or = .694 [P < or = .004]), but RTA was not construct valid. VA scores distinguished consultant from trainee operators (Mann-Whitney P < .02), with trainers able to discriminate between trainee levels (Wilcoxon P = .01 to .023). Concurrent validity was demonstrated by the VA (trainers tau-b = .71 to .79 [P < .001] and trainees tau-b = .79 to .82 [P < .001]) with good trainer-trainee agreement (EBSTAF-Tech tau-b = .35 [P = .03), Toronto tau-b = .46 [P = .006), and visual analogue scale tau-b = .46 [P = .006]).

CONCLUSIONS:
VA of BST tissue-handling skills is feasible, reliable, valid, and highly sensitive. It may also improve trainee self-assessment skills by promoting reflective practice.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Driscoll, Peter J (PJ); Paisley, Anna M (AM); Paterson-Brown, Simon (S);

Affiliation: Department of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), New Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Validation Studies

Journal: American journal of surgery (Am J Surg), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2008-Aug; vol 196 (issue 2) : pp 265-72

Dates: Created 2008/07/21; Completed 2008/08/07;

PMID: 18558396, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

4/7/2005
1/28/2008
Higher Relevance Score (584/1000)
Lower Relevance Score (502/1000)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2008 (ACN 104 198 263) - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index