Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 30 Jan 2008):

Performance-enhancing technologies and moral responsibility in the military.

Full Abstract

New scientific advances have created previously unheard of possibilities for enhancing combatants' performance. Future war fighters may be smarter, stronger, and braver than ever before. If these technologies are safe, is there any reason to reject their use? In this article, I argue that the use of enhancements is constrained by the importance of maintaining the moral responsibility of military personnel. This is crucial for two reasons:
the military's ethical commitments require military personnel to be morally responsible agents, and moral responsibility is necessary for integrity and the moral emotions of guilt and remorse, both of which are important for moral growth and psychological well-being. Enhancements that undermined combatants' moral responsibility would therefore undermine the military's moral standing and would harm combatants' well-being. A genuine commitment to maintaining the military's ethical standards and the well-being of combatants therefore requires a careful analysis of performance-enhancing technologies before they are implemented.

 

Learn Faster Today      Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Wolfendale, Jessica (J);

Affiliation: Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Department of Philosophy, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. jwo@unimelb.edu.au

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: The American journal of bioethics : AJOB (Am J Bioeth), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2008-Feb; vol 8 (issue 2) : pp 28-38

Dates: Created 2008/06/23; Completed 2008/07/22;

PMID: 18570075, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentIn: Am J Bioeth. 2008 Feb;8(2):39-41; discussion W4-6. (PMID: 18570076)

CommentIn: Am J Bioeth. 2008 Feb;8(2):42-3; discussion W4-6. (PMID: 18570077)

CommentIn: Am J Bioeth. 2008 Feb;8(2):44-5; discussion W4-6. (PMID: 18570078)

CommentIn: Am J Bioeth. 2008 Feb;8(2):46-7; discussion W4-6. (PMID: 18570079)

CommentIn: Am J Bioeth. 2008 Feb;8(2):47-9; discussion W4-6. (PMID: 18570080)

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

10/30/2005
1/30/2008
Higher Relevance Score (400/1000)
Lower Relevance Score (249/1000)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy.com 2003-2008 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index