|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2008): |
The choice of distracting task can affect the quality of auditory evoked potentials recorded for clinical assessment.
Full Abstract
Auditory evoked potential (AEP) recordings often require subjects to ignore the stimuli and stay awake. In the present experiment, early (ABR), middle (MLR), and late latency (LLR) AEPs were recorded to compare the effect of five different distracting tasks:
(1) doing nothing eyes open, (2) reading, (3) watching a movie, (4) solving a three-digit sum, and (5) doing nothing eyes closed (or counting the stimuli for LLR). Results showed that neither the amplitudes nor the latencies of the ABR, MLR, or LLR were affected by task. However, the amount of pre-stimulus activity (noise) or amplitude rejection was significantly and differently affected by the distracting task. For the ABR, the math task was the noisiest but, for the MLR, the amount of noise was greater when watching a movie. As for the LLR, reading and watching a movie yielded the lowest percentage of rejected traces. In conclusion, the choice of distracting task depends on the AEP being measured and should be chosen to improve the quality of the AEP traces and thus reduce recording time.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Lavoie, Brigitte A (BA); Hine, Jemma E (JE); Thornton, Roger D (RD);
Affiliation: MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, UK. balavoie(-atsign-)soton.ac.uk
Grants: (Agency:United Kingdom Medical Research Council)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: International journal of audiology (Int J Audiol), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jul; vol 47 (issue 7) : pp 439-44
Dates: Created 2008/06/24; Completed 2008/07/25;
PMID: 18574782, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
14 Jan 2007 - Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex.
27 Aug 2007 - Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
11 Dec 2005 - Age-dependent changes of auditory evoked potentials--effect of task difficulty.
30 Jul 2007 - Increased right auditory cortex activity in absolute pitch possessors.
5 Nov 2005 - The effect of aging on auditory components of event-related brain potentials.
18 May 2008 - [Dipole models for the sources of late evoked potential components in verbal tasks for intermodal attention and memory in humans]
29 Apr 2005 - Event-related potentials elicited by distractors in an auditory oddball paradigm in schizophrenia.
4 Oct 2005 - Acute nicotine fails to alter event-related potential or behavioral performance indices of auditory distraction in cigarette smokers.
30 Mar 2006 - Changes in click characteristics during ABR recording.
30 Dec 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.