|
|
| Research article summary (published 22 Jun 2008): |
Criteria for the evaluation of large cohort studies: an application to the nurses' health study.
Full Abstract
Evaluating the success of major funding programs from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) remains a vexing challenge. We propose a set of criteria to evaluate epidemiological studies that fit within the discovery, development, and delivery paradigm introduced by the NIH. We apply these criteria to the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), a large epidemiological cohort study initiated in the 1970s to evaluate the associations between oral contraceptives and risk of breast cancer and between diet and other lifestyle factors and risk of cancer overall. Our evaluation suggests that the NHS has led to important changes in health practice, and it underscores the need to develop metrics that are suitable to the evaluation of large epidemiological cohort studies.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Colditz, Graham A (GA); Winn, Deborah M (DM);
Affiliation: School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA. colditzg(-atsign-)wustl.edu
Grants: CA89469 (Agency:United States NCI)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Journal: Journal of the National Cancer Institute (J Natl Cancer Inst), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jul; vol 100 (issue 13) : pp 918-25
Dates: Created 2008/07/02; Completed 2008/07/29;
PMID: 18577745, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Evaluating research for use in practice: what criteria do specialist nurses use?
29 Apr 2005 - Using a multidisciplinary classification in nursing: the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health.
30 Jan 2005 - Evaluation of a postgraduate training programme for community mental health practitioners.
30 Mar 2005 - Risk prediction models with incomplete data with application to prediction of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: prospective data from the Nurses' Health Study.
Jul 2008 - A comparison of prospective and retrospective evaluations of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index for systemic lupus erythematosus.
29 Apr 2005 - Nurse home visit programs for the elderly.
30 Dec 2005 - Evaluation of four proposed bleeding criteria for the onset of late menopausal transition.
11 Jun 2006 - Prevalence of diseases and statistical power of the Japan Nurses' Health Study.
29 Sep 2007 - ENN-ICS--implementation and evaluation of a multilingual learning management system for sleep medicine in Europe.
30 Dec 2005 - National comparative curriculum evaluation of baccalaureate nursing degrees: a framework for the practice based professions.
30 Jul 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.