|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 May 2008): |
Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment.
Full Abstract
Recent findings suggest that exerting executive control influences responses to moral dilemmas. In our study, subjects judged how morally appropriate it would be for them to kill one person to save others. They made these judgments in 24 dilemmas that systematically varied physical directness of killing, personal risk to the subject, inevitability of the death, and intentionality of the action. All four of these variables demonstrated main effects. Executive control was indexed by scores on working-memory-capacity (WMC) tasks. People with higher WMC found certain types of killing more appropriate than did those with lower WMC and were more consistent in their judgments. We also report interactions between manipulated variables that implicate complex emotion-cognition integration processes not captured by current dual-process views of moral judgment.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Moore, Adam B (AB); Clark, Brian A (BA); Kane, Michael J (MJ);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Green Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08550, USA. amtwo(-atsign-)princeton.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society / APS (Psychol Sci), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jun; vol 19 (issue 6) : pp 549-57
Dates: Created 2008/06/26; Completed 2008/08/28;
PMID: 18578844, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
29 Jun 2006 - Ripple effects in memory: judgments of moral blame can distort memory for events.
30 Mar 2006 - Executive functioning and memory as potential mediators of the episodic feeling-of-knowing accuracy.
19 Feb 2008 - Theory of mind and executive function: working-memory capacity and inhibitory control as predictors of false-belief task performance.
30 May 2006 - Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control.
29 Apr 2007 - Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: evidence from the serial reaction time task.
27 Feb 2005 - Exercise and working memory: an individual differences investigation.
29 Nov 2007 - Verbal working memory in children with mild intellectual disabilities.
30 Jan 2007 - The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.
30 Dec 2006 - Individual differences in the suppression of unwanted memories: the executive deficit hypothesis.
30 Jan 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.