|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 May 2008): |
Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?
Full Abstract
Inductive learning -- that is, learning a new concept or category by observing exemplars -- happens constantly, for example, when a baby learns a new word or a doctor classifies x-rays. What influence does the spacing of exemplars have on induction? Compared with massing, spacing enhances long-term recall, but we expected spacing to hamper induction by making the commonalities that define a concept or category less apparent. We asked participants to study multiple paintings by different artists, with a given artist's paintings presented consecutively (massed) or interleaved with other artists' paintings (spaced). We then tested induction by asking participants to indicate which studied artist (Experiments 1a and 1b) or whether any studied artist (Experiment 2) painted each of a series of new paintings. Surprisingly, induction profited from spacing, even though massing apparently created a sense of fluent learning: Participants rated massing as more effective than spacing, even after their own test performance had demonstrated the opposite.
Author information
Author/s: Kornell, Nate (N); Bjork, Robert A (RA);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. nkornell(-atsign-)ucla.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society / APS (Psychol Sci), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jun; vol 19 (issue 6) : pp 585-92
Dates: Created 2008/06/26; Completed 2008/08/28;
PMID: 18578849, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Infants' knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking.
30 May 2001 - Asking for help.
30 Aug 2003 - Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
29 Nov 2006 - Theoretical and clinical aspects: an overview.
30 Mar 1998 - Analog numerical representations in rhesus monkeys: evidence for parallel processing.
30 May 2004 - Category dimensionality and feature knowledge: when more features are learned as easily as fewer.
27 Feb 2006 - Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations.
23 Aug 2007 - Concept abstraction in the aging dog: development of a protocol using successive discrimination and size concept tasks.
10 Aug 2004 - Visual perception of human activity and gender in biological-motion displays by individuals with mental retardation.
29 Apr 1999 - What perceptual rules do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) follow in completing partly occluded figures?
29 Sep 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.