|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2008): |
Political and legal institutions and their influence on drug policy: an Australian perspective.
Full Abstract
ISSUES:
Under a federal system of government, political power is separated and distributed between different institutions of government. The distribution of power to enact policies that influence alcohol and other drug use can impact on the associated harm.
APPROACH:
A description of the separation of powers under a federal system of government is followed by three case studies of alcohol and other drug policies which have been influenced by the use of power by different institutions of government.
KEY FINDINGS:
Whether or not a policy is enacted depends upon who has the power to bring such a policy into being, who has the power to prevent its enactment and whether those with such power choose to use them.
CONCLUSION:
The enactment of policy is a political act, needing to be understood by those wishing to see evidence-based policies brought into being. An understanding of the separation of powers under a federal system of government is one aspect of the political process that those who work in the alcohol and other drug field need to understand.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Ryder, David (D);
Affiliation: School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia. david.ryder(-atsign-)ecu.edu.au
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Drug and alcohol review (Drug Alcohol Rev), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jul; vol 27 (issue 4) : pp 374-9
Dates: Created 2008/06/27; Completed 2008/08/11;
PMID: 18584386, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
|
|
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Land, ecology, and democracy. A twenty-first century view.
27 Feb 2006 - Newspaper coverage of drug policy: an analysis of pre-election reporting of the Greens' drug policy in Australia.
30 Dec 2007 - The rise and fall of Australian physical activity policy 1996 - 2006: a national review framed in an international context.
29 Jul 2008 - Biobank governance: trends and perspectives.
30 Dec 2006 - Addressing legal and political barriers to global pharmaceutical access: options for remedying the impact of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and the imposition of TRIPS-plus standards.
29 Jun 2008 - An Australian case study on biosecurity: some legal, constitutional, ethical and policy reflections.
29 Nov 2006 - Legal and policy lessons from the Schiavo case: is our right to choose the medical care we want seriously at risk?
30 May 2006 - Changes in political astuteness after a health systems and policy course.
30 Oct 2007 - Access to oral health care - an Australian perspective.
30 May 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.