In the laboratory of the states: the progress of Glucksberg's invitation to states to address end-of-life choice.

Full Abstract

It has now been ten years since the Supreme Court handed down Glucksberg and Quill, rulings on laws that forbid "assisted suicide." In that time, normative and legal developments in the fields of law, medicine, and psychology have changed the landscape of the discourse on the choice of a mentally competent, terminally ill individual to choose to self-administer medications to bring about a peaceful death. Although the Court rejected petitioners' claims that state laws denying them the ability to end their terminal illnesses through self-administered medication violated the Constitution, it left states with the opportunity to experiment with legislation that would allow terminally ill individuals the choices they had previously sought through litigation. Oregon's experience with its Death with Dignity Act, which grants terminally ill, mentally competent individuals the choice to end their lives through self-administered medication, has proven that such laws provide comfort not only to those who, faced with the prospect of a horrible death from a terminal illness, choose to end their lives in a peaceful and dignified manner, but also to those to ultimately choose not to. Additionally, Oregon's experience shows that the fears that originally attended the "assisted suicide" debate are unfounded so long as proper procedures are in place. Because Oregon's Death with Dignity Act has proven both useful and harmless, this Article concludes that it is time for other states to follow Oregon's lead and enact their own legislation to allow their citizens an alternative to what otherwise could be a prolonged and painful death from terminal illness.

Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills

Author information

Author/s: Tucker, Kathryn L (KL);

Affiliation: Lewis and Clark School of Law, United States.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Michigan law review (Mich Law Rev), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2008-Jun; vol 106 (issue 8) : pp 1593-612

Dates: Created 2008/07/02; Completed 2008/07/18;

PMID: 18595217, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Civil Rights - legislation & jurisprudence
Euthanasia - legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Life Support Care - legislation & jurisprudence
Mental Competency - legislation & jurisprudence
Oregon
Personal Autonomy

Personal Autonomy
State Government
Suicide, Assisted - legislation & jurisprudence
Supreme Court Decisions
Terminal Care - legislation & jurisprudence
Terminally Ill - legislation & jurisprudence
United States

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.