 |
| Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2008): |
The application of evidence-based practice to nonspeech oral motor treatments.
Full Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to help speech-language pathologists (SLPs) apply the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP) to nonspeech oral motor treatments (NSOMTs) in order to make valid, evidence-based decisions about NSOMTs and thus determine if they are viable treatment approaches for the management of communication disorders. METHOD: A detailed description of EBP is provided, including levels of evidence for rating the quality of evidence. NSOMTs are described and a survey of the literature on NSOMTs is provided along with a determination of the level of evidence of each study reported. A systematic literature search was conducted using the electronic databases of MEDLINE and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) within an unrestricted time period. In addition, reference lists from identified articles were also reviewed. Ethical and fiscal issues related to EBP and NSOMTs, as well as clinical implications of EBP for the use of NSOMTs, are discussed. RESULTS: A total of 45 articles/reports were published between 1981 and 2006 in peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed journals. Most of the sources (25) relied on weak anecdotal evidence and opinions. Moreover, studies that employed stronger designs reported negative results for NSOMTs (i.e., evidence against the use of NSOMTs for modifying speech). CONCLUSION: Despite their use for many years and their popularity among some SLPs for the treatment of a wide variety of speech problems in children and adults, NSOMTs are controversial because sufficient evidence does not exist to support their effectiveness in improving speech. Moreover, limited evidence exists for the use of NSOMTs to facilitate nonspeech activities. Therefore, the available evidence does not support the continued use of NSOMTs as a standard treatment and they should be excluded from use as a mainstream treatment until there are further data. SLPs should consider the principles of EBP in making decisions about NSOMTs.
Author information
Author/s: Lass, Norman J (NJ); Pannbacker, Mary (M);
Affiliation: West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6122, USA. nlass(-atsign-)wvu.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Review
Journal: Language, speech, and hearing services in schools (Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2008-Jul; vol 39 (issue 3) : pp 408-21
Dates: Created 2008/07/03; Completed 2008/11/18;
PMID: 18596297, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 2/18/2009)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MeSH Headings (categories) shown below.
Note: Bold headings indicate primary MeSH headings or qualifiers.
Related articles
These are the most related articles currently in our database:
- A nationwide survey of nonspeech oral motor exercise use: implications for evidence-based practice.
29 Jun 2008 - Do we really want a quick fix? 24 Feb 2000
Related Article Map
2/24/2000
6/29/2008
Higher Relevance Score (41)
Lower Relevance Score (12)
Legend: 
- FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. 
- Title only. More help.
See a larger map of 100+ related articles.