Enhancing concentration, mood and memory in healthy individuals: an empirical study of attitudes among general practitioners and the general population.

Full Abstract

AIM: To study attitudes towards enhancing concentration, mood and memory in healthy individuals among the general public and general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of vignettes including three cases dealing with enhancement of concentration, mood and memory was sent during 2006 to 1000 randomly selected people from Stockholm and 300 GPs. We asked about the use of pharmaceuticals for healthy individuals for the benefit of others and the benefit to oneself; we also asked whether or not society should pay the cost. Finally, we asked about enhancement of healthy people's concentration, mood and memory through the use of natural remedies. RESULTS: Fifty-two per cent of the general public and 39% of the GPs responded. While the use of natural remedies was perceived as fairly acceptable, majorities in both groups were negative with regard to the use of pharmaceuticals to enhance concentration, mood and memory in a healthy individual. The general public tended to be less negative than the GPs. There was a significant difference between the reasons for providing enhancement; altruistic reasons seem to be more acceptable than egoistic ones. For both groups, enhancing mood was more controversial than enhancing memory. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the large dropout rate, the study indicates that enhancement by means of natural remedies of different human capacities is acceptable to the general public, while only small minorities of both groups are inclined to allow the use of pharmaceuticals. When compared to the egoistic reason, the altruistic one for enhancing concentration, mood and memory with pharmaceuticals seems to influence the general public's inclination to support prescriptions; this was also the case among the GPs, but only as regards mood enhancement.

Author information

Author/s: Bergström, Lena Strand (LS); Lynöe, Niels (N);

Affiliation: Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article

Journal: Scandinavian journal of public health (Scand J Public Health), published in Sweden. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2008-Jul; vol 36 (issue 5) : pp 532-7

Dates: Created 2008/07/18; Completed 2008/09/04;

PMID: 18635734, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.