|
|
| Research article summary (published 7 Aug 2008): |
[Health communication and public media: professionals need to be heard]
(Medische publieksinformatie: beroepsbeoefenaren, laat u horen.)
Full Abstract
The exchange of information on individual healthcare and public health as well as public opinion on medical matters are characterized by their own systems of values, norms and conventions that are not always compatible. All of these aspects put together give public communication on health and care its complex and dynamic nature--where the interests of the individual and the community are often opposed. In this respect, the free interaction of publicity forces and the educational role of healthcare providers have traditionally been the backbone of policy in the Netherlands. There is only limited support by public money, only a few restrictions (for example, on direct-to-consumer drug-advertising) but no substantive guidance from the government. Websites funded from public money that provide information on healthcare have only been set up in the last few years. The Health Council of the Netherlands has recently proposed trust marking for screening tests only. Research is urgently needed with regard to health literacy, direct-to-consumer advertising and public communication on the appropriate use of care. Furthermore, professional opinion in the public arena is required as well as a more active role on the part of clinical and scientific professionals in the area of public debate.
Learn Faster Today Improve your study skills
Author information
Author/s: Meijman, F J (FJ);
Affiliation: VU Medisch Centrum, afd. Metamedica, Postbus 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam. fj.meijman@vumc.nl
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: English Abstract; Journal Article
Journal: Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde (Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd), published in Netherlands. (Language: dut)
Reference: 2008-Aug; vol 152 (issue 32) : pp 1760-4
Dates: Created 2008/08/29; Completed 2008/09/30;
PMID: 18754306, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/6/2008)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article (including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Public health literacy in America: an ethical imperative.
30 Mar 2005 - Preparedness for allied health professionals: risk communication training in a rural state.
30 Dec 2006 - [Humanization in health care]
6 May 2006 - Use of communication technology among public health professionals in New South Wales, Australia.
30 Dec 2006 - [Media and public health: example of heat wave during summer 2003]
30 Oct 2005 - Communication and diet: an overview of experience and principles.
27 Feb 2007 - Informed choice and public health screening for children: the case of blood spot screening.
30 May 2005 - [Public access to information about the services and quality of care in public hospitals: the need for methodologic clarity. A survey of 44 university hospital directors and administrators]
27 Feb 2006 - Generic versus specific competencies of entry-level public health graduates: employers' perceptions in Poland, the UK, and the Netherlands.
5 Dec 2006 - Position of the American Dietetic Association: food and nutrition misinformation.
30 Mar 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.