 |
| Research article summary (published 30 Oct 2008): |
An ethnographic study of physiotherapists' perceptions of their interactions with patients on a chronic pain unit.
Full Abstract
Changes in health care brought about by the increased incidence of chronic conditions have resulted in an increased focus on patient self-directed care. This ethnographic study explores from the therapists' perspectives how therapist/patient interactions influence success or contribute to meeting the patients' goals on a pain management program. A team of physiotherapists were observed individually with their patients over a period of 6 months. Their interactions were audiotaped, transcribed, analysed, and cross-referenced to the field notes and the follow-up interviews with the therapists after each observation. The analysis was iterative, guided by questions and contextualised. Codes, categories, and evolving patterns of behaviour were documented, and three major themes were identified. The therapist/patient interactions demonstrated certain consistent standpoints toward the purpose of the program. The team judged those who achieved positive outcomes, as having entered into interactions typified by assertiveness, negotiation, and critical reflection. However, even the most able team of therapists will not be able to create a collaborative framework unless their patients are willing to grasp the opportunity offered to them, and they judged their least successful patients as having adopted unwilling and unrealistic interactions. Interactions of resistance or an inability to carry over problem solving skills into their lives resulted in a negative outcome for the patients and a stunting of the team's potential.
Author information
Author/s: Thomson, Di (D);
Affiliation: Academic Department of Physiotherapy, School of Biomedical Sciences, Kings College, London University, London, UK. diane.thomson(-atsign-)kcl.ac.uk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Physiotherapy theory and practice (Physiother Theory Pract), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: -2008 Nov-Dec; vol 24 (issue 6) : pp 408-22
Dates: Created 2009/01/01; Completed 2009/04/09;
PMID: 19117232, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 4/9/2009, IMS Date: 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.