Nicotine does not enhance discrimination performance in a temporal bisection procedure.

Full Abstract

Recent reports of selective disruption of stimulus control by drug administration and other disruptive operations in temporal discrimination procedures may be interpreted as a disruption of attention to the temporal sample stimuli. This experiment assessed the effects of nicotine, a compound that has been widely shown to increase measures of attention, on temporal discrimination performance. Pigeons responded under a psychophysical choice procedure in which responses to one key color were correct after presentation of four shorter sample durations and responses to another key color were correct after presentation of four longer sample durations. Performance under nicotine was characterized by using a model that differentiates the effects of nicotine on stimulus control, bias, and sensitivity of temporal discrimination. Nicotine selectively decreased the measure of stimulus control, but did not systematically affect the measures of timing. Mecamylamine (1.0 mg/kg) failed to antagonize the disruptive effects of nicotine. These results suggest that disruption of temporal discrimination performance in this preparation may not have been dependent on the specific pharmacology of nicotine and underscore the importance of quantitative separation of the effects of various manipulations on stimulus control from effects on timing.

Author information

Author/s: Ward, Ryan D (RD); Barrett, Scott T (ST); Johnson, Robert N (RN); Odum, Amy L (AL);

Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Utah, USA. rw2353(-atsign-)columbia.edu

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Behavioural pharmacology (Behav Pharmacol), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-Feb; vol 20 (issue 1) : pp 99-108

Dates: Created 2009/01/30; Completed 2009/03/03; Revised 2009/07/07;

PMID: 19179853, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 7/24/2009, IMS Date: 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.