|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Mar 2009): |
Dimensions of personality: clinicians' perspectives.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To obtain the opinions and preferences of practising clinicians about the clinical utility of personality scales included within 8 alternative dimensional models of personality disorder for inclusion within an official diagnostic nomenclature. METHOD: Psychiatrists (n = 226) and psychologists (n = 164) from 2 continents provided clinical utility ratings on personality scales organized from 8 alternative dimensional models of personality disorder. RESULTS: The psychiatrists and the psychologists supported the inclusion of most of the scales from all 8 of the models that were compared. Normal personality traits were endorsed, although abnormal personality traits generally received higher levels of endorsement. The list of endorsed traits was reduced further by organizing the scales into groups based on redundancy within each of 5 broad domains and then selecting within each group the scale that received the highest rating. CONCLUSIONS: This list appears to represent each domain in a manner that is comprehensive both in its coverage of the respective domain, as well as in representing particular strengths of each of the alternative dimensional models, at least for the stated preferences of psychiatrists and psychologists.
Author information
Author/s: Mullins-Sweatt, Stephanie N (SN); Smit, Vera (V); Verheul, Roel (R); Oldham, John (J); Widiger, Thomas A (TA);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA. stephanie.sweatt(-atsign-)gmail.com
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie (Can J Psychiatry), published in Canada. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Apr; vol 54 (issue 4) : pp 247-59
Dates: Created 2009/03/26; Completed 2009/06/10;
PMID: 19321031, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 6/10/2009, IMS Date: 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.