Non-inferiority tests for clustered matched-pair data.

Full Abstract

Non-inferiority tests for matched-pair data where pairs are mutually independent may not be appropriate when pairs are clustered. The tests may require an adjustment to account for the correlation within a cluster. We consider the adjusted score and Wald-type tests, and a modification of Obuchowski's method for non-inferiority and compare them with the non-inferiority test based on a method of moments estimate in terms of Type 1 error rate and power by simulations for a small cluster size under various correlation structures. In general, the score test adjusted by an inflation factor and the modified Obuchowski's method perform as good as the test based on moments estimate in the accuracy of Type 1 error rates. The latter does not provide reasonably close Type 1 error rates to the nominal level when the number of clusters is 25 or smaller and a positive response rate for the standard procedure is 20 per cent or lower. The adjusted score test, the method based on moments estimate and the modified test are comparable in power. The adjusted Wald-type test is too anti-conservative and we should caution use of the test. Since number of clusters is strongly related to the accuracy of empirical Type 1 error rate and power, it is very important to have a sufficiently large number of clusters in designing a clustered matched-pair study for non-inferiority.

Author information

Author/s: Nam, Jun-Mo (JM); Kwon, Deukwoo (D);

Affiliation: Biostatistics Branch, DCEG, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Rockville, MD 20852-7244, U.S.A. namj(-atsign-)mail.nih.gov

Grants: Z01 CP010181-05 (Agency:NCI NIH HHS)

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural

Journal: Statistics in medicine (Stat Med), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-May; vol 28 (issue 12) : pp 1668-79

Dates: Created 2009/05/07; Completed 2009/07/01; Revised 2009/07/31;

PMID: 19326387, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 8/21/2009, IMS Date: 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.

See 100+ related articles.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.