Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 28 May 2009):

Inverse probability-of-censoring weights for the correction of time-varying noncompliance in the effect of randomized highly active antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death.

Full Abstract

In 1996-1997, the AIDS Clinical Trial Group 320 study randomized 1156 HIV-infected U.S. patients to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) or highly active ART with equal probability. Ninety-six patients incurred AIDS or died, 51 (4 per cent) dropped out, and 290 (= 51 + 239, 25 per cent) dropped out or stopped their assigned therapy for reasons other than toxicity during a 52-week follow-up. Such noncompliance likely results in null-biased estimates of intent-to-treat hazard ratios (HR) of AIDS or death comparing highly active ART with combination ART, which were 0.75 (95 per cent confidence limits [CL]: 0.43, 1.31), 0.30 (95 per cent CL: 0.15, 0.60), and 0.51 (95 per cent CL: 0.33, 0.77) for follow-up within 15 weeks, beyond 15 weeks, and overall, respectively. Noncompliance correction using Robins and Finkelstein's (RF) inverse probability-of-censoring weights (where participants are censored at dropout or when first noncompliant) yielded estimated HR of 0.46 (95 per cent CL: 0.25, 0.85), 0.43 (95 per cent CL: 0.19, 0.96), and 0.45 (95 per cent CL: 0.27, 0.74) for follow-up within 15 weeks, beyond 15 weeks, and overall, respectively. Weights were estimated conditional on measured age, sex, race, ethnicity, prior Zidovudine use, randomized arm, baseline and time-varying CD4 cell count, and time-varying HIV-related symptoms. Noncompliance corrected results were 63 and 13 per cent farther from the null value of one than intent-to-treat results within 15 weeks and overall, respectively, and resolve the apparent non-proportionality in intent-to-treat results. Inverse probability-of-censoring weighted methods could help to resolve discrepancies between compliant and noncompliant randomized evidence, as well as between randomized and observational evidence, in a variety of biomedical fields. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

 

Author information

Author/s: Cain, Lauren E (LE); Cole, Stephen R (SR);

Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, U.S.A.

Grants: R03-AI 071763 (Agency:NIAID NIH HHS)

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Journal: Statistics in medicine (Stat Med), published in England. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-May; vol 28 (issue 12) : pp 1725-38

Dates: Created 2009/05/07; Completed 2009/07/01;

PMID: 19347843, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 7/1/2009, IMS Date: 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.

See 100+ related articles.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy LLC 2003-2009 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index