Cultural competency in medical education: demographic differences associated with medical student communication styles and clinical clerkship feedback.

Full Abstract

PURPOSE: We tested the significance of associations among students' demographics, communication styles, and feedback received during clerkships. METHODS: US medical students who completed at least one required clinical clerkship were invited between April and July 2006 to complete an anonymous, online survey inquiring about demographics, communication styles (assertiveness and reticence), feedback (positive and negative), and clerkship grades. The effects of self-identified race/ethnicity, gender, and generation (immigrant, first- or second-generation American) and their 2-way interactions on assertiveness, reticence, total positive and total negative feedback comments were tested using factorial analysis of covariance, controlling for age, clerkship grades, and mother's and father's education; pairwise comparisons used simple contrasts. Two-sided P values < .05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Medical students from 105 schools responded (N = 2395: 55% women; 57% white). Men reported more assertiveness than women (P = .001). Reticence (P < .001) and total positive comments (P = .006) differed by race/ethnicity; in pairwise contrasts, black, East Asian, and Native American/ Alaskan students reported greater reticence than white students (P < .001), and white students reported receiving more positive comments than black, and South and East Asian students. Race/ethnicity-by-generation (P = .022) and gender-by-generation (P = .025) interaction effects were observed for total negative comments; white first-generation Americans reported receiving the fewest and male immigrants reported receiving the most negative comments. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic differences in students' communication styles and feedback they received highlight a need for cultural competency training to improve medical student-teacher interactions, analogous to training currently advocated to improve physician-patient interactions.

Author information

Author/s: Lee, Katherine B (KB); Vaishnavi, Sanjeev N (SN); Lau, Steven K M (SK); Andriole, Dorothy A (DA); Jeffe, Donna B (DB);

Affiliation: Washington University School of Medicine, 4444 Forest Park, Ste 6700, St Louis, MO 63108, USA. kathyleemd(-atsign-)gmail.com

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Journal of the National Medical Association (J Natl Med Assoc), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-Feb; vol 101 (issue 2) : pp 116-26

Dates: Created 2009/04/21; Completed 2009/05/07; Revised 2009/08/05;

PMID: 19378627, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 8/21/2009, IMS Date: 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.

See 100+ related articles.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.